Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) on Tuesday departed on a three-day trip to Shanghai to attend the Shanghai-Taipei Twin-City Forum.
“The Republic of China is a democratic country, so there will be contrasting opinions toward any important policy decision ... so we are very grateful and will value it,” Chiang told reporters in Taipei.
Chiang is correct: the Republic of China (ROC) is a democracy, but the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is not. The PRC does not recognize ROC sovereignty, and it does not respect the perspectives, opinions or authority of the ROC’s politicians.
Chiang’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has repeatedly espoused adherence to a “one China” policy and the so-called “1992 consensus,” presenting this as a way to foster good cross-strait relations. However, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has already rejected the KMT’s understanding of those concepts, denying the idea of “one China with different interpretations.” From Beijing’s perspective, there is only “one China,” that China is the PRC, and Taiwan will inevitably be unified with it.
Xi has said that “peaceful unification” is preferred, but he has ordered the People’s Liberation Army to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Beijing has expressed its intention of applying to Taiwan a version of its “one country, two systems” formula, which is used in Hong Kong and Macau.
Hong Kong and Macau have already lost all semblance of autonomy promised to them under that formula, including freedom of speech, freedom of the press and other freedoms, and Taiwan’s major political parties have already rejected the formula outright.
Given this, what could Chiang or any other Taiwanese politician hope to achieve by engaging China?
“Cross-strait relations are complicated and cannot be simplified to a few sentences, so there must be a mechanism for dialogue,” Chiang said, adding that action is needed to resolve friction.
That is a truly interesting take, as any friction is entirely the PRC’s fault. The ROC does not threaten the PRC, the ROC does not attempt to limit PRC participation in international organizations, the ROC does not arbitrarily impose import bans on Chinese goods, and the ROC does not engage in provocative military drills near PRC territory. Those are all things that the PRC does to the ROC.
It is futile for Taiwan’s politicians to seek Beijing’s fair treatment of Taiwan by engaging the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The PRC is an enemy and existential threat to the ROC, and Beijing is not interested in dialogue unless it leads to Taiwan’s capitulation and the abandonment of its sovereignty.
If anything, Taiwanese politicians visiting the PRC should be subject to intense scrutiny, as Beijing would undoubtedly use the opportunity to interfere with Taiwan’s domestic politics or its elections.
Taiwan Republic Office director Chilly Chen (陳峻涵) on Tuesday was at Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport) holding a sign that read: “The Twin-City Forum is the model for the ‘united front’ campaign,” and urged Chiang not to become a “chess piece” in China’s “united front” tactics toward Taiwan.
Whether Chiang is susceptible to manipulation is unknown, but the CCP only wants dialogue with Taiwanese politicians who further CCP aims — or those whom the CCP believes would be malleable.
If Xi and the CCP were amenable to real dialogue with Taiwan on an equal footing, why do they refuse to talk with Taiwan’s democratically elected Democratic Progressive Party? President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has always said she is open to dialogue.
There is no benefit from Taiwanese politicians visiting China, and such visits should be highly discouraged — if not prohibited entirely by legislative amendment. Acknowledgment of ROC sovereignty should be a prerequisite for any talks with the CCP.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
On Sunday, elite free solo climber Alex Honnold — famous worldwide for scaling sheer rock faces without ropes — climbed Taipei 101, once the world’s tallest building and still the most recognizable symbol of Taiwan’s modern identity. Widespread media coverage not only promoted Taiwan, but also saw the Republic of China (ROC) flag fluttering beside the building, breaking through China’s political constraints on Taiwan. That visual impact did not happen by accident. Credit belongs to Taipei 101 chairwoman Janet Chia (賈永婕), who reportedly took the extra step of replacing surrounding flags with the ROC flag ahead of the climb. Just
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS