Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) on Tuesday departed on a three-day trip to Shanghai to attend the Shanghai-Taipei Twin-City Forum.
“The Republic of China is a democratic country, so there will be contrasting opinions toward any important policy decision ... so we are very grateful and will value it,” Chiang told reporters in Taipei.
Chiang is correct: the Republic of China (ROC) is a democracy, but the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is not. The PRC does not recognize ROC sovereignty, and it does not respect the perspectives, opinions or authority of the ROC’s politicians.
Chiang’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has repeatedly espoused adherence to a “one China” policy and the so-called “1992 consensus,” presenting this as a way to foster good cross-strait relations. However, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has already rejected the KMT’s understanding of those concepts, denying the idea of “one China with different interpretations.” From Beijing’s perspective, there is only “one China,” that China is the PRC, and Taiwan will inevitably be unified with it.
Xi has said that “peaceful unification” is preferred, but he has ordered the People’s Liberation Army to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Beijing has expressed its intention of applying to Taiwan a version of its “one country, two systems” formula, which is used in Hong Kong and Macau.
Hong Kong and Macau have already lost all semblance of autonomy promised to them under that formula, including freedom of speech, freedom of the press and other freedoms, and Taiwan’s major political parties have already rejected the formula outright.
Given this, what could Chiang or any other Taiwanese politician hope to achieve by engaging China?
“Cross-strait relations are complicated and cannot be simplified to a few sentences, so there must be a mechanism for dialogue,” Chiang said, adding that action is needed to resolve friction.
That is a truly interesting take, as any friction is entirely the PRC’s fault. The ROC does not threaten the PRC, the ROC does not attempt to limit PRC participation in international organizations, the ROC does not arbitrarily impose import bans on Chinese goods, and the ROC does not engage in provocative military drills near PRC territory. Those are all things that the PRC does to the ROC.
It is futile for Taiwan’s politicians to seek Beijing’s fair treatment of Taiwan by engaging the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The PRC is an enemy and existential threat to the ROC, and Beijing is not interested in dialogue unless it leads to Taiwan’s capitulation and the abandonment of its sovereignty.
If anything, Taiwanese politicians visiting the PRC should be subject to intense scrutiny, as Beijing would undoubtedly use the opportunity to interfere with Taiwan’s domestic politics or its elections.
Taiwan Republic Office director Chilly Chen (陳峻涵) on Tuesday was at Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport) holding a sign that read: “The Twin-City Forum is the model for the ‘united front’ campaign,” and urged Chiang not to become a “chess piece” in China’s “united front” tactics toward Taiwan.
Whether Chiang is susceptible to manipulation is unknown, but the CCP only wants dialogue with Taiwanese politicians who further CCP aims — or those whom the CCP believes would be malleable.
If Xi and the CCP were amenable to real dialogue with Taiwan on an equal footing, why do they refuse to talk with Taiwan’s democratically elected Democratic Progressive Party? President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has always said she is open to dialogue.
There is no benefit from Taiwanese politicians visiting China, and such visits should be highly discouraged — if not prohibited entirely by legislative amendment. Acknowledgment of ROC sovereignty should be a prerequisite for any talks with the CCP.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS