Among the lesser of former British prime minister Winston Churchill’s attributes were a wicked sense of humor and a huge ego.
He once quipped: “We are all worms. But I do believe that I am a glow-worm.”
For his inspired leadership during World War II, we can forgive his hubris. Few have never encountered his famous remarks made when Britain seemed to be staring defeat in the eyes:
“We shall defend our island whatever the cost ... We shall fight on beaches ... landing grounds ... in the fields and in the streets ... in the hills; we shall never surrender.”
The words ooze courage, defiance, inspiration and honesty about the struggle ahead.
Churchill validated the idiom “Cometh the hour, cometh the man.” Are his qualities to remain mere relics of the tragic first half of the 20th century?
I witnessed US Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy say on CNN on Friday that China can invade Taiwan after 2028, when the US has achieved semiconductor independence, adding: “Our goal should not be for [Russian President Vladimir] Putin to lose” in Ukraine, but for the US to achieve a working relationship with him.
What can we say? “Cometh the hour, cometh the worm”?
We appeased Hitler for six years.
Since 2000, we have appeased Putin, first giving him free rein to exercise his iron fist in Chechnya and then to invade Georgia in 2008.
In 2001, in the name of free trade ideology, and in the interests of greedy corporations and financiers, we granted China entry to the WTO. Now it uses its wealth and military might as sticks with which to beat the rest of the world, especially Taiwan.
Former US president George W. Bush, the archetypal worm, boasted of his “C”-grade academic record, went to war on a big lie with the dictator of a small country, and declared of Putin: “I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy.”
Electorates in the US and Europe reacted with horror to his Iraq war, and when a true casus belli arose when Syrian President Bashir al-Assad began exterminating his own people, no US or European leader intervened.
Who did? Putin; on the side of the aggressor, al-Assad.
That was on the watch of then-US president Barack Obama, who later stood by as Russia invaded Crimea, as did the British — reliable leaders on European security in the post-World War II era — forsaking the legacy of Churchill and preoccupying themselves with an unedifying squabble over an unedifying, self-defeating policy: Brexit.
Europeans continued to buy Russian energy; commodities once foremost among the prizes sought by Hitler. The road to hell is awash with oil and gas.
Enter former US president Donald Trump and a presidency of many outrages, including bed-sharing with Putin, despite the invasion of Crimea and persistent preparations to invade Ukraine. US President Joe Biden seems to be strengthening US alliances in Asia and assures the world that the US will defend Taiwan, although the White House contradicts him, and he both failed to defend Ukraine, and cut and ran from Afghanistan after a 20-year, multitrillion-dollar engagement.
May the freedom-loving Biden prevail over his weaker alter ego.
Our supine leaders have led us to an abyss, at the bottom of which lies tyranny and suffering.
The hour has come for bold, freedom-loving champions of democracy, civil rights, human rights and the rule of national and international law to reclaim the democratic world. It behooves all democrats to use their votes, activism and freedom of expression to ensure this.
What are we? Men and women, or worms? Let’s do it.
Mark Rawson is a writer, translator and editor based in Taiwan.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS