Vice President William Lai (賴清德) has no plans for Taiwan to formally declare independence if elected president in next year’s election, he told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published on Tuesday.
“Taiwan is already a sovereign, independent country called the Republic of China,” and “there are no plans to change the name of our country,” Lai said.
The statement was perhaps a response to questions surrounding Lai’s past description of himself as a “pragmatic worker for Taiwan independence.”
Nevertheless, it is inconsequential whether Taiwan declares independence since, as Lai himself said, the nation already has de facto independence. Whether or not that independence is recognized by the UN or other parties, Taiwan is in control of its own administrative affairs.
However, a crucial precursor to other nations including the US recognizing that independence and establishing formal diplomatic relations would be for Taiwan to amend its laws and Constitution, to remove references to territory now under the administration of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), and to recognize the PRC as a separate sovereign nation.
The Taiwanese Constitution does not use the term “mainland,” but it makes reference to “existing national boundaries,” which is phrasing from the original 1947 Constitution.
There are also innumerable laws that stipulate special arrangements for people living in the PRC such as the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例).
Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) did attempt to amend the Constitution, but faced heavy opposition from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). That strong opposition remains in Taiwan today, which is why if Lai is elected he should engage the KMT in discussions and his administration should put this issue to a public vote through a referendum.
Taiwan’s future depends on it formally letting go of outdated and unrealistic territorial claims. For Taiwan’s Constitution to continue to assert sovereignty over PRC territory and modern-day Mongolia is the same as if Italy were to lay claim to France, England, Turkey and other parts of modern Europe and Africa based on the historical extent of the Roman Empire.
Ending such claims and recognizing the PRC’s sovereignty has important national security implications.
Taiwan’s judicial system cannot treat Chinese espionage as foreign aggression due to the nation’s failure to recognize the PRC as a foreign nation, Taiwan Statebuilding Party Chairman Wang Hsing-huan (王興煥) said on Wednesday. As a result, Chinese infiltration efforts in Taiwan have grown rampant, and those caught are shown leniency, he said.
There is no need for Taiwan to change the nation’s name, but Lai should push a “two Chinas” policy, to counter Beijing’s “one China” policy and to assert the nation’s sovereignty.
In a feature story published on April 17, 2018, veteran foreign-affairs researcher and retired US foreign service officer John J. Tkacik Jr wrote that the US followed a “two Chinas” policy throughout the 1970s.
“In 1971, the most vocal opponent of ‘two Chinas’ turned out to be Taiwan’s then-president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), and not the PRC’s founding father Mao Zedong (毛澤東),” he wrote.
Since then, the KMT has been unwavering in its opposition to a “two Chinas” policy and recognition of the PRC, which has put the US in a precarious situation. Perhaps it seemed to Chiang that there was hope for Taiwan to defeat the People’s Liberation Army and to “take back the mainland,” but that is nowhere near a possibility in modern times, nor is it the aim of Taiwanese in general.
Taiwan must clearly define the nation as the territory currently under its administration, and formally recognize the PRC as a foreign nation.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS