A heated conversation between a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Keelung city councilor and a local resident on whether an ammunition depot in the city should be relocated has stirred debate about public attitudes toward national security in Taiwan, and has drawn speculation on the KMT’s cross-strait stance.
After nine soldiers were injured in a blast at the Hsiang Feng military base depot in Keelung on Monday, KMT Keelung City Councilor Lu Mei-ling (呂美玲) on Tuesday visited a local market to hear residents’ opinions with a reporter in toe.
Lu’s suggestion of relocating the depot to Yilan or New Taipei City was met with dissent by a resident in his 60s, surnamed Lai (賴), who said that the depot has been there for decades, protecting people from invasion, and asked: “If it is removed, where would we get ammunition if communist China attacks us?”
Lai said the depot provides ammunition to the navy’s 131st Fleet and artillery at Keelung Harbor, and relocating it would place the ammunition too far away to reach it in time if China suddenly attacked, so the depot must stay, as it is protecting Taiwan.
“Why do you want to have war? Just like the US and Ukraine...” Lu asked. Lai replied: “I do not want a war. It is communist China that wants to wage war against us.” Lu then pointed a finger at him, saying that “communist China does not want to attack, it is you who is asking for it. If the Chinese military had plans to attack Taiwan, they would have done it earlier. You are asking for a beating.”
She also tried to intimidate Lai by saying that “eligibility for military call-up can be up to 75 years old,” and “if a war starts, do not forget that you must fight on the front line,” to which Lai said that he would surely stay and fight the Chinese troops.
In an interview on Thursday, Lu said: “If you [the government] are asking for a beating, we in Keelung want independence. If the Republic of China (ROC) does not take care of Keelung residents, we will ask the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to take care of us.”
Lu on Friday said that Taiwan should not follow in the US’ footsteps and ruin its future, but the KMT said that her remarks contravened its charter and had damaged its reputation. In the evening, Lu apologized for her “slip of the tongue” and resigned from the party.
While the KMT quickly distanced itself from Lu, people noticed that her attitude toward national security and cross-strait relations is not markedly different from that of many higher-ranking KMT figures and pan-blue political parties, as well as Beijing’s stance.
KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) has said that President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) refusal to acknowledge the so-called “1992 consensus” is a “great provocation” to Beijing, and KMT Legislator Shen Chih-hwei (沈智慧) has said that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s frequent reports of Chinese military aircraft entering Taiwan’s air defense identification zone arer provoking Beijing, and that it is eager to stir up cross-strait tensions.
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), who sought the KMT’s presidential nomination earlier this year, wrote in an op-ed piece published by the Washington Post on July 17 that Tsai’s and the DPP’s rejection of the “one-China” framework has greatly aggravated the risk of war.
The KMT’s constant claims that it would safeguard the ROC is concerning, but refusing to highlight the source of the threat to Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific region, and even siding with Beijing in saying that the DPP-led government’s efforts to strengthen national defense and form partnerships with democracies are provocative actions that invite war.
Lu’s blunt “you’re asking for a beating” simply highlights the party’s attitude toward national defense, and her false claim that military call-up includes men up to 75 years old clearly examplifies how disinformation can be used to wage “cognitive warfare” to try to influence the public.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS