Recently, a dining controversy has caused an uproar on the Internet. On Saturday last week, 27 students from the Department of Information and Finance Management of National Taipei University of Technology went to a stir-fry restaurant after a summer camp. Before being served the dishes they ordered, they wolfed down two pots of free rice, and asked the owner to bring more rice. As rice needed time to cook, the owner suggested that they order stir-fried noodles instead, which the students blankly refused. They left before the new round they ordered of rice was ready to eat.
Even though the students did not make a scene at the restaurant, they gave the restaurant one-star reviews, and wrote about their “unfair” treatment.
Their complaints triggered a serious backlash. Internet users started speaking up for the owner and excoriated of the students’ behavior on the department’s fan page with a flood of comments. Under social pressure, the dean and the students went back to the restaurant to apologize to the owner.
However, they later complained that they were forced to do so by the school authorities, and that they felt disappointed with the school for not “protecting them” or hearing them out. As the controversy did not die down, the owner suspended operations.
Although this was a minor incident, it exposes several social issues. The first one is that some Taiwanese tend to exploit restaurants’ free food policy, as the “salmon chaos” incident in 2021 showed, when people changed their names to get free sushi, or when customers got so much food at all-you-can-eat buffets that they left behind mountains of leftovers.
It is apparent that the students wanted to exploit the policy instead of opting for alternatives such as stir-fried noodles.
To say that a place is civilized means more than just displaying fine art or skyscrapers. It also entails people’s manners and behavior, and this kind of greed is a flaw in the Taiwanese character.
The other issue is the problem with the review system. As people are now living in the digital age, information such as ratings and comments are open to the public on the Internet. Even though the review system was meant for feedback and comments, it has become a tool to threaten service providers for any detail.
Although customers have the right to give ratings, they should remember that mutual respect and empathy are still required for good dining experiences, and that paying money does not automatically make them superior. For many owners, the one-star rating might be more humiliating and infuriating than customers not paying for their meals.
As those who were involved in the incident were students, school authorities should also have let them take responsibility for their own behavior, instead of compelling them to apologize or apologizing on their behalf. Their interference in the incident not only did not remedy anything, but also led the students to resent them.
In an age where people can enjoy trolling and trash-talking on the Internet without consequences, many users are more than happy to treat conflict and complaints as a joke, and make malicious remarks instead of offering solutions or discovering the truth.
To put an end to the vicious cycle, the most important principle is to show others the respect that they deserve.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS