As the presidential candidate of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) has to overcome many hurdles to reach the presidential office. In addition to confronting former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), chairman of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), and Vice President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Hou needs to deal first with two major figures in the KMT: former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘).
Hou has been working hard to cozy up to Han to save his low approval ratings and consolidate the support of the deep-blue camp. The two finally met at the Huang Fu-hsing (黃復興) military veterans’ branch. Even though the two men were seated next to each other, it was clear that there was a huge division between them. Never has Han said something like “please support Hou You-yi.” The interaction between them and their body language also revealed a clear message.
Obviously, Han has not yet let go of Hou’s attitude toward him in the 2020 presidential election.
His reaction to Hou’s presidential campaign is only to give Hou a dose of his own medicine.
However, if Hou’s approval ratings were higher than they are now, could Han still give Hou the cold shoulder? A lesson can be learned from the Han-Hou relationship: Politicians are ruthless and calculating, and their actions are entirely based on realistic thinking.
For them, it is difficult to let bygones be bygones. Asking them to return good for evil is certainly out of the question. They are far from saints. They are politicians.
An even more embarrassing incident happened to Hou at the event when some participants, apparently supporters of Han, shouted “president Han.” Indeed, even though Han and Hou met and sat together, their togetherness was merely for the sake of formality. Han’s support for Hou is ambiguous, and Han’s supporters have remained steadfastly loyal to him.
The Han-Hou relationship and their different attitudes respectively in 2020 and this year show that the person who is not running for president would gain the upper hand.
However, even though Han has been giving Hou the cold shoulder, he is not really qualified to do that. What makes him think it appropriate to be so complacent? As the saying goes: “A defeated general cannot count himself brave.” In 2018, Han miraculously won the local elections for the KMT to become Kaohsiung mayor, but before long, he was vanquished in the presidential election in 2020.
Han’s defeat severely affected the KMT’s legislative candidates, and he was soon removed from his mayoral post by Kaohsiung residents in a recall vote. At that point, party morale within the KMT was at a truly low point.
These incidents show that Han is more of a liability than an asset to the KMT. He always speaks in a way to knock someone off their feet and his political stance is to promote unification with China. Even so, Han is still recognized by the KMT as a remarkable figure, and by Hou as a rescuer of his low approval ratings. If anything, it proves that the KMT and Hou can no longer do much about the presidential election.
Han is a piece of driftwood for the KMT to hang on to in the open sea. Grabbing it might prolong the time before it sinks below the waves, but it certainly cannot ensure that it will safely make landfall.
Chen Wen-ching works in environmental services.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS