The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Tuesday said that it would continue to provide assistance to Palau for tourism and infrastructure, with the Pacific ally under pressure from China to break ties with Taiwan.
The importance to Taiwan, the US and other like-minded nations of good ties with Palau and keeping it free from Beijing’s influence is vital, as it is part of the second island chain, halfway between Guam and the Philippines — which are crucially important to strategic efforts to curtail Chinese expansionism in the Indo-Pacific region.
After Beijing built up Palau’s dependence on China for tourism, a vital component of its economy, it then stopped sending tourists to force Palau to switch recognition from Taipei to Beijing.
China Airlines has two direct flights per week between Taiwan and Palau, but, despite always being full, they cannot meet tourism needs.
Taipei should subsidize airlines to increase flights to Palau. It could partner with Japan and South Korea to help promote tourism there. If the flights are always full, there is clearly demand for travel to Palau, so promotional work should be straightforward.
There are other ways to help. For example, software companies could establish offices in Palau, and train and hire Palauan software engineers. The government could pay Taiwanese to work on infrastructure projects in Palau at no cost to the Palauan government.
The response of Palau’s leadership to Chinese pressure shows that money alone would not lure it into establishing ties with China, but it still has economic needs that must be met so Beijing cannot force Ngerulmud’s hand.
The US provides assistance through the Compact of Free Association, as well as through the Philippines-based office of the US Agency for International Development. Taiwan could cooperate with those agencies to help develop and fund infrastructure in Palau.
Taiwan must take the issue seriously, because Chinese economic and political influence go hand in hand, meaning Beijing might establish a police or military presence in Palau, as it has done in other countries.
The US is responsible for Palau’s defense and there has been talk of establishing a US military base there. If that happened, the navies of Taiwan and other countries could stop at ports there, assuming Palauans assented, which would also boost its economy.
Partners in the region have grown closer in the past few years due to shared concerns over Chinese expansionism. Australia in March announced plans to work with the US and the UK to upgrade its submarine fleet; the Philippines has allowed the US access to some of its bases; and on Sunday, the USS Ronald Reagan aircraft carrier docked in Da Nang, Vietnam.
Agence France-Presse on Monday said that the port call was only the third by a US aircraft carrier to the nation since the end of the Vietnam War.
“The visit gives that message that Vietnam is continuing to balance against China by improving its security relationship with the US and with other outside powers,” University of New South Wales Canberra researcher Nguyen The Phuong told AFP.
Boosting partnerships and exchanges to counter Chinese expansionism is vital, so ties with Palau are important and calls for assistance must not be taken lightly. The relationship must be protected as regional powers seek to demonstrate unity in the face of Chinese aggression.
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
RSS