In Germany, incidents of China trying to gather intelligence through educational exchanges have been exposed repeatedly over the past few years.
German Minister of the Interior and Community Nancy Faeser said that the danger was particularly considerable in the economic, industrial and science sectors, and warned that German companies, universities and research institutions should be highly vigilant.
She said that every precaution should be taken to prevent Chinese infiltration, and highlighted three priorities to enhance Germany’s security: identifying risks, averting dangers and avoiding dependencies.
In the name of educational collaboration, China has been sending doctoral students to participate in German companies’ research projects. These students have access to the companies’ information technology. After they return to China, they file a patent application and turn German technologies into Chinese ones.
It should be mentioned that incidents such as this have happened elsewhere, and China’s aim is to steal technologies and gather intelligence from foreign countries.
As Faeser said, Chinese spies’ activities have put Germany’s economy, industry and scientific research at risk. Precautionary measures must be implemented to stop them.
China has never stopped sending students to foreign countries for “educational exchanges.” It is clear that Beijing intends to steal confidential intelligence from others.
On April 26, the newly revised Anti-Espionage Law of the People’s Republic of China was passed and is to come into effect on July 1. In addition to the current 40 articles, another 31 have been added to the law.
With the revised law, the Chinese government can prohibit foreign media from reporting on the actual situation in China, while reinforcing the surveillance of foreigners in Chinese territory. This way, stealing foreign companies’ production secrets in China would not be against the law, and the stolen information and technologies could be put to use for China.
Under Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) rule, the Chinese government has jettisoned international norms and challenged the global world order. China has been engaging in the theft of civilian technologies overseas and appropriating them for its military use.
The purpose is to bolster the power of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. In the near term, China might become so powerful that all foreigners in Chinese territory could be in danger. Traveling to China, Hong Kong and Macau should therefore be avoided.
Visiting places that are greatly influenced by China might be dangerous as well. To protect its own information and intelligence, every country should improve its pre-emptive measures and defense against China.
Yi An is an assistant at Tamkang University’s Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Emma Liu
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US