Taiwan is a country with substantial savings. In its latest forecast, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) said that the nation’s ratio of excess savings to GDP this year would exceed 10 percent for the 11th consecutive year. Although the figure is expected to fall to 13.22 percent from 14.87 percent last year as economic growth slows, while savings and investments decline, Taiwan has a high level of excess savings. The DGBAS predicts the amount could reach NT$3.08 trillion (US$100.24 billion) this year, exceeding NT$3 trillion for four consecutive years, following NT$3.37 trillion last year, NT$3.66 trillion in 2021 and NT$3.12 trillion in 2020.
As cumulative excess savings over the past four years are expected to total NT$13.22 trillion and the amount has exceeded half of the nation’s GDP, the situation demands the government’s attention, with initiatives to encourage investment or spending to boost the economy. Based on DGBAS data, Taiwan’s excess savings rate was 2 to 3 percent in the 1990s, before gradually moving into the teens in the early 2000s and reaching 15.53 percent in 2017. That was the highest since 1987. The rate dropped to 13.32 percent in 2018 and 11.82 percent in 2019, but rebounded to 15.66 percent in 2020 and 16.85 percent in 2021. While the figure retreated to 14.87 percent last year, it was still the highest in Asia, compared with China’s 2.3 percent, Japan’s 2.1 percent and South Korea’s 1.8 percent.
Taiwanese have long considered thrift a virtue, and excess savings means that local businesses and consumers have large cash reserves. Too much extra savings also indicates the nation’s private consumption and investment momentum is lacking. If businesses and consumers are reluctant to invest or spend in the domestic market to stimulate the economy, it is likely that such money would go overseas to finance investments in other countries. The latest central bank data showed that the nation’s financial account — which includes direct and portfolio investments — registered net outflows for the 51st consecutive quarter in the first quarter of this year, at US$12.19 billion, while aggregate net outflows were US$742 billion at the end of March.
In the past few years, Taiwanese businesses have brought large amounts of funds back home after the government launched incentives to do so. However, these funds have not been fully channeled into real production, but instead have been used to speculate in domestic real estate — which has increased home prices — or spent on domestic equities — which has further amplified speculation and investor risk.
Excess savings is a complicated issue that requires more analysis by government agencies to help explain the reasons behind its surge in the past few years, including the COVID-19 pandemic, a trade surplus, the investment environment, the economic structure and the money supply. It is also important to know whether the increase is due to a rapid growth in household savings or because of a marked increase in savings by private corporations, and why.
The increase in savings is a severe warning for Taiwan, as it not only presents a short-term economic challenge, but also a long-term competitiveness issue. The big question is what the government can do to channel these funds into investments in the real economy and if government agencies from the central bank to the National Development Council and the Ministry of Economic Affairs can escalate efforts to tackle the issue.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Workers’ rights groups on July 17 called on the Ministry of Labor to protect migrant fishers, days after CNN reported what it described as a “pattern of abuse” in Taiwan’s distant-water fishing industry. The report detailed the harrowing account of Indonesian migrant fisher Silwanus Tangkotta, who crushed his fingers in a metal door last year while aboard a Taiwanese fishing vessel. The captain reportedly refused to return to port for medical treatment, as they “hadn’t caught enough fish to justify the trip.” Tangkotta lost two fingers, and was fired and denied compensation upon returning to land. Another former migrant fisher, Adrian Dogdodo
RSS