Amid the fierce competition between China and the US over Taiwan, Sabella Abidde, a distinguished professor of political science at Alabama State University and a Taiwanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs fellow, offers a fresh and thought-provoking perspective on the decline of Western civilization. His analysis sheds light on the significance of democratic values in shaping Taiwan’s future and safeguarding its sovereignty.
Abidde has been in Taipei since January, immersing himself in the complex dynamics of East Asian politics and international relations. As the editor of several notable publications, including China and Taiwan in Africa: The Struggle for Diplomatic Recognition and Hegemony, his insights hold particular weight in the ongoing geopolitical struggle for Taiwan. During an interview on May 19 at National Chengchi University, Abidde highlighted the regenerative powers of Western civilization and their potential impact on the US-China competition. He argued persuasively that Western civilization, with its emphasis on democracy, human rights and the rule of law, holds the potential to inspire and guide Taiwan in its pursuit of sovereignty and self-determination.
“The battle for Taiwan goes beyond mere military confrontation; it represents a contest of ideologies and values,” Abidde said. “The regenerative powers of Western civilization, rooted in its unwavering commitment to democracy and individual freedoms, provide Taiwan with a compelling alternative amidst the pressures imposed by China’s assertiveness.”
While acknowledging China’s remarkable economic and technological advancements, Abidde cautioned against underestimating the intrinsic value of Western civilization’s contributions, even to China’s rise. He pointed to the historical achievements of Western democracies in fostering economic prosperity, safeguarding human rights and promoting social justice as evidence of the regenerative capabilities of Western ideals. He also underscored Taiwan’s own significance as a thriving democracy with a vibrant civil society, emphasizing how it serves as a testament to the transformative power of Western civilization. Considering this, he emphasized the vital role the US, as a champion of democratic values, should play in strengthening its support for Taiwan amid China’s growing influence.
“The United States has a crucial role in upholding the principles of Western civilization and ensuring the continuation of Taiwan’s democratic progress,” Abidde said. “By doing so, it not only protects a valued ally, but also reinforces the notion that democracy and individual liberties are universal aspirations.”
Abidde’s analysis offers a unique perspective on the ongoing competition over Taiwan, contrasting with the views of authors who argue for the decline of Western societies and the rise of potential competitors, notably China. While aligning with academics like Francis Fukuyama, Ian Morris and Niall Ferguson, Abidde emphasizes the regenerative powers of Western civilization. However, his perspective stands in contrast to Oswald Spengler’s cyclical view of history, Samuel Huntington’s focus on cultural clashes and Arnold Toynbee’s comprehensive analysis. By highlighting the potential for regeneration, Abidde underscores the importance of democratic values in shaping the future of Taiwan and safeguarding its sovereignty.
Engaging with diverse viewpoints enriches our understanding of the complexities involved in the battle for Taiwan and the broader geopolitical landscape. As we navigate an ever-changing world, it is crucial to consider the multifaceted factors that contribute to the decline and potential revitalization of Western civilization.
Richard Atimniraye Nyelade is a sociology-anthropology lecturer at the University of Ottawa and a visiting scholar at National Chengchi University.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS