Tien Feng-wen (田豐文) should be thanked for his letter, “Disciplining corrupt judges,” published in the Taipei Times on May 24. Tien outlined how the Disciplinary Court demoted two judges and urged this supervisory court to promote higher standards and battle judicial misconduct.
This is good, but ongoing reform of the judicial system is taking decades. As everyone grows old waiting, a new approach could be used to bypass the huge factions and infighting that continually hinder change.
The Legislative Yuan and the Ministry of Justice could amend laws to enhance free speech by building on the principle that laws in a democracy belong to the public, and therefore the public should have access to the courts.
In the West, a janitor, courier, or housewife can go into a courtroom and take in the proceedings during a lunch break. Journalists in the West use this right to report back to people who choose not to exercise their right to attend the courts.
That is why most people in the West grew up reading newspaper columns such as “In the Courts” — perhaps it was in the Toronto Star — that gave juicy court accounts of crimes and disputes. These well-written pieces made law easy and fun, and were full of interesting quotes from the plaintiff, the accused and the judge, in banter that ended with a verdict.
Every day, several mini reports helped people trace arguments and evidence as they sat back and thought about the case, and how they might have given a different verdict if they were the judge — or how it would feel to be the guilty person.
This spirit is missing from Taiwan’s system — built upon a feudal Bismarck system of the propertied and noble that alienated Karl Marx and Frederick Engels. In contrast with the West, Taiwan offers a living museum, a tyrannical army of dinosaur judges with egos larger than Australia.
In their sealed courtrooms, the prosecutors and judges do what they like without the threat of a prying journalist scribbling down their outlandish remarks as they shun evidence that might shed light on justice. A good journalist with support could expose and end this self-serving culture through their observations.
I have watched how a prosecutor can fiddle the court record to develop their version of reality.
When I was giving a statement at Xinyi Police Station on an assault case, an employee of a security company I was charging told me in front of the recording police officer: “You won’t win. We have people inside the courts.”
The police ignored this warning. Maybe most Taiwanese distrust judges because of the condescending attitude many judges hold toward ordinary people, who are often victims of the authorities.
I have never seen the public in the courts, and the media come only for celebrity hearings. Unlike in the West, the “privacy rights” of gangsters and scoundrels come before identifying evil to the public.
However, in the West, everyone in a case — including the judge — can assume that they would be quoted and named in the media.
Of course, most judges would oppose opening their sanctuaries to the media and public, as the greater punishment for them would be the public wrath attached to their names. They are currently only reported as “the judge.”
The opening of the courts to the public and media would advance democracy. Laws and new protocols must be made to protect journalists vulnerable to court contempt and libel laws, journalism schools should open court courses and visits to train scribes with the skills of the court beat, and the media should be in the courts daily with an eye on judges and a grip on the law.
Curtis Smith is founder of the Union of TAITRA Workers.
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Taiwan’s economic momentum, driven by demand for artificial intelligence (AI) products, remains strong, with booming demand for advanced semiconductors, servers and key components. In the first quarter, GDP expanded 14.55 percent year-on-year, the second consecutive quarter of double-digit percentage growth and accelerating from the 12.95 percent expansion in the previous quarter, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) reported on Friday. Net exports remained the dominant driver of growth, contributing 10.33 percentage points to Taiwan’s GDP growth in the first quarter. That came as exports rose 35.76 percent year-on-year in the first quarter, outpacing 26.34 percent growth in imports, the