After World War II, more than 130 states around the world achieved autonomy or independence from their colonial rulers, with the exception of Taiwan.
Under the authoritarian rule of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), Taiwan pulled out of the UN in 1971, refusing to hold a seat at the UN under the title “Republic of Taiwan.”
Afterward, former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) went on to accelerate Taiwan’s democratic reform, while former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) proposed the “one country on each side” formula in 2002, strengthening democracy during his tenure.
With President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), Taiwan has been undergoing an economic transformation. As the global community acknowledges Taiwan’s efforts and accomplishments, political leaders and delegations have started visiting Taiwan, unfazed by Chinese threats.
Tsai’s diplomatic progress with other nations and increasingly energetic efforts to elevate Taiwan’s status have won the recognition and support of Taiwanese.
A survey conducted by the Association of Chinese Elite Leadership said that 59.6 percent of respondents are happy with Tsai’s performance in safeguarding Taiwan’s sovereignty, 77.5 percent believed that the global community is more concerned about cross-strait issues, 60.5 percent thought that the international community has ratcheted up support for Taiwan and 57.1 percent believed that Taiwan has had a bigger influence on the global community.
Despite these efforts, that a democratic nation is still not recognized on the international stage as an independent and sovereign country is a source of pain and frustration for Taiwanese.
Ever since the pro-Taiwan Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) regained the presidency seven years ago, Taiwan has made progress by leaps and bounds with its economy, technology and military. Given the changing political and geopolitical circumstances in the international order, Taiwan, as it strives to complete its normalization as a nation, must tackle long-term, pressing issues such as national sovereignty, national security, judicial reform, transitional justice, cultural education, social welfare, and environmental and economic development.
A pro-Taiwan coalition of civil elites and local non-governmental organizations recently launched a forum called the Civil Society Conference on National Affairs. By inviting local politicians to take part in discussions, the forum seeks to propose solutions and reforms to address the aforementioned issues and report to Taiwanese.
It is also calling on the candidates in next year’s presidential election to listen to people and introduce policy programs that are in accordance with the public’s needs in their campaigns.
As political parties in Taiwan have demonstrated explicit pro-US or pro-China stances, Taiwanese, when casting their ballots for their favored candidate, would be either siding with the democratic or the autocratic camp, which could lead to peace or war in due course.
For Taiwan, it could also mean holding on to a democratic, free society, or becoming a second Hong Kong under the oppressive thumb of China.
Taiwan’s fate should be decided by Taiwanese, and its democracy and freedom are the unwavering consensus and the most cherished values of every resident living in the nation. Taiwanese should once again come together to display their ironclad commitment to freedom and democracy in opposition to China’s autocracy in next year’s election.
Chang Yeh-shen is the founder of the Civil Society Conference on National Affairs and a former chairman of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Rita Wang
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS