Two petitions recently posted on the Public Policy Online Participation Network Platform calling for a four-day workweek and reduced working hours have passed the signature threshold, requiring the government to respond.
One of the petitions asked that the government make Taiwan the first country in Asia to implement a three-day weekend, while the other appealed to revise Article 30 of the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) to lower the number of daily working hours to six or seven, or 30 to 35 hours per week.
According to the petition, although Taiwan’s average annual working hours dropped to 2,000 in 2021, the lowest in history, it was still the fourth-highest in the world. The petitioner hopes an extra day off could improve productivity, reduce employee turnover, and allow people to spend more time with family and friends.
Taiwan has already come a long way regarding its work revolution. In 1998, the government introduced a policy of a five-day workweek per fortnight, in the hopes that private firms would reduce working hours. This paved the way for the introduction of 84 work hours per fortnight, and finally a five-day workweek policy in 2001. With the implementation of the five-day workweek, the government canceled seven national holidays, such as Teacher’s Day.
A four-day workweek policy could cause other issues. Although the three-day weekend trend seems to be popular in places such as the US, the Netherlands and Japan, it is still in experimental and trial phases, and has only been adopted by some companies, rather than an all-out policy. Without any country fully adopting the policy, Taiwan should take baby steps when considering its implementation.
The policy might not suit all industries. As the economy is largely export-oriented and manufacturing focused, many sectors require a presence seven days per week, high productivity and a large labor force — such as public transportation, healthcare and public services. Fewer working hours could be impractical or unfavorable to these industries, and it could affect public services and some workers, such as contract workers, could end up with salary cuts. For other sectors, the policy would force employees to work overtime on their workdays to maintain the same workload, which would go against the spirit of the petition.
The policy would not be popular for small and medium-sized enterprises. With regulations governing workers’ days off, and capital paying for workers’ labor insurance and pension, a four-day workweek policy would become a huge burden to these enterprises, which could lead to layoffs. Companies in these areas might have to pay more in overtime fees, or have to draft staff to make up shortfalls.
As with the implementation of the five-day workweek, a four-day workweek would be at the expense of national holidays. For the education sector, that would mean the elimination of summer or winter breaks.
As Taiwanese start to fight for a work-life balance, perhaps the Ministry of Labor could start by amending the Labor Act and first cut down the number of working hours, or increase the number of national holidays with other measures. Instead of pie-in-the-sky labor policies, it would be better for the government to adopt a modest approach.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS