With the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) set to nominate its presidential candidate today, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) has pulled out all the stops in an attempt to win the nomination.
Gou publicly accused Straits Exchange Foundation Chairman David Lee (李大維) of calling him to block his purchase of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines during Lee’s term as Presidential Office secretary-general, at the order of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).
This accusation lacks concrete evidence, and Lee has denied the claim.
I believe that many people still admire Gou for coordinating the Yonglin Foundation and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) to each donate 5 million doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines to Taiwan in 2021.
In response, Tsai, accompanied by Lee, met with Gou and TSMC chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) at the Presidential Office on June 18, 2021, to express her gratitude to them, and the Presidential Office released a statement and photographs to publicize the event.
Gou’s fight for vaccine purchases benefited not only the millions of people who received the shots, but also earned him praise from the Democratic Progressive Party government. While striving for the KMT’s presidential nomination, it would be worth his while to remember his achievement, which showed his philanthropy and ability to break through party lines.
Regrettably, Gou has chosen to cater to skeptics while leaning toward extremists, trying to sensationalize the rumor that “the Tsai administration blocked vaccines.”
By doing so, he is missing the opportunity to unite Taiwan and show his good side.
Elections pass, but the candidates’ characters and integrity are remembered.
Gou’s campaign slogan: “For Taiwan, for the people, Terry Gou,” might be appealing, but I hope he does not lie or smear others for the sake of winning the nomination.
Huang Wei-ping is a former think tank researcher and a Kaohsiung resident.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
On Monday last week, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Raymond Greene met with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers to discuss Taiwan-US defense cooperation, on the heels of a separate meeting the previous week with Minister of National Defense Minister Wellington Koo (顧立雄). Departing from the usual convention of not advertising interactions with senior national security officials, the AIT posted photos of both meetings on Facebook, seemingly putting the ruling and opposition parties on public notice to obtain bipartisan support for Taiwan’s defense budget and other initiatives. Over the past year, increasing Taiwan’s defense budget has been a sore spot
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future