The annual civil defense drill was held in Taipei on Thursday, with participants simulating responses to natural disasters and war. The Taipei Fire Department said the exercises emphasized air raid evacuation, distribution of supplies, prevention and control of infectious diseases, and disaster rescue, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported.
CNA cited Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) as saying that this year’s drills involved a scenario in which the military would be unable to provide assistance with those measures. The drills involved rescuers, volunteers, members of civil defense units and reservists, as well as 144 active and reserve alternative service members. A civil defense program with annual exercises helps ensure Taiwan’s readiness in the event of a conflict with China, but the government should expand the scope of the program to include members of the public.
One of the advantages Ukraine had in its defense against Russia’s invasion was having so many civilian volunteers. Civilian involvement in defense is even more crucial in Taiwan, where, unlike Ukraine, evacuation might not be possible after the start of a conflict.
As an island, Taiwan would struggle to evacuate — and it is widely believed that China would impose a blockade around the nation, preventing vessels and aircraft from getting in or out. While Taiwan might receive military assistance from the US and other countries, it would need to rely on itself in the initial period. In such a contingency, the better prepared the public is, the less likely people are to panic, and the more capable they would be to assist with logistical and emergency responses. If able-bodied members of the public could assist with defense operations, Taiwan’s chances would be even better.
United Microelectronics Corp founder Robert Tsao (曹興誠) in September last year donated NT$1 billion (US$32.64 million) to the Kuma Academy, which offers courses on cross-strait geopolitics and strategy, invasion scenarios, disinformation and first aid. Tsao has vowed to train “3 million people in three years” and 300,000 “marksmen” for a civilian militia. Kuma has thousands of people on its waiting list, and demand for airsoft gun training courses at Camp 66 in Taipei has increased, Foreign Policy reported on Dec. 19 last year.
The government should do more to help meet this demand. It could provide weapons training courses to the public without the need for active or reservist training enrollment. It could also encourage public involvement in the civil defense drill, requiring employers to provide paid leave for those who wish to participate, and holding the drills more frequently.
Such training does not need to be limited to adults. The government could introduce subsidized first aid, hand-to-hand combat and weapons training courses to students in high school and university.
The military should do more to make conscription more meaningful. A CNN report on Feb. 20 cited six conscripts as calling mandatory training “outdated, boring and impractical.”
“In our company, we had more than 100 assault rifles, but only slightly more than a dozen could be used for shooting practice,” one conscript said. Outdated bayonet training and the memorization of slogans still play a large part in mandatory service, the report said.
The government must provide more substantial training programs that are useful to scenarios that Taiwanese could actually find themselves in, in the event of a conflict with China. This includes urban warfare, cognitive warfare, cyberwarfare, drone operation, close-range weapons combat and the types of training practiced by the Kuma Academy, and during civil defense drills.
Without useful, meaningful training, the majority of Taiwanese would be ill-prepared in the event of a military conflict.
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
RSS