China is using military drills, conducted without warning and using live ammunition, as a pretext for further encroachment on Taiwanese territory, National Defense University researcher Ma Chen-kun (馬振坤) said on Tuesday. The use of live ammunition meant the drills risked developing into combat, and likely represented a scenario in which Beijing could authorize the use of military force to deter “Taiwanese independence activities,” he said.
China used the drills to “further approach the 12 nautical mile [22.2km] baseline of Taiwan’s territorial waters,” and could have been “a pretext to break into Taiwan’s 24 nautical mile contiguous zone,” he said.
However, China did not enter Taiwan’s territorial waters, nor did it enter Taiwan’s contiguous zone, which means that the drills were held in international waters. China might also say that its crossing of the Strait’s median line — defined in 1955 by US Air Force general Benjamin Davis — was not an escalation, as it is a marker Beijing has never recognized. Other countries hold drills in international waters, so from China’s perspective, its actions were not provocative.
That is not to suggest the Chinese naval drills are not harmful to Taiwan’s interests. They might not directly affect Taiwanese sovereignty, but they represent Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics, which seek to gradually push the boundaries of what it can get away with before other countries take action.
As such, China is likely to conduct combat readiness patrols more frequently and without warning, to further pressure Taiwan’s defense lines at sea and in the air, Ma said. This could force Taiwan to waste resources, wear down troops and equipment, and decrease military and public morale whenever accidents might occur.
The US and other countries are keen to assert that the Taiwan Strait comprises international waters, as they should be. Even if Taiwan were under the administration of the People’s Republic of China, the majority of the strait would remain outside of its 12 nautical-mile zone.
The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea stipulates that “every state has the right to establish the breadth of its territorial sea up to a limit not exceeding 12 nautical miles, measured from baselines determined in accordance with this convention.”
However, China, despite being a UN member, has said on other occasions that it does not recognize the Taiwan Strait or much of the South China Sea as being international waters. By exerting claims — often through dangerous, confrontational behavior — that run contrary to international norms, China is putting at risk the commercial interests of the nations that rely on uninhibited passage through the Indo-Pacific region.
Taiwan should encourage the US and other countries to hold joint drills in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea. Several countries already regularly pass through these areas to assert freedom of navigation, and there is no reason they could not also hold drills with Taiwan in the region.
Protesting every time China holds drills in international waters is not productive, and doing so does not deter China. Instead, Taiwan and other countries should take action to show Beijing that it is not the only country that can hold drills at whim, ask others to halt air and sea traffic, and flex its military muscle to demonstrate a resolve to push back if pushed.
If Taiwan, the US and other countries start flying, sailing and launching missiles near China’s shores, perhaps Beijing might get the message to back off.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS