A photograph of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) taking a deep bow before a statue of Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) while presenting a yellow floral wreath at the Republic of China founder’s mausoleum in Nanjing during his 12-day visit to China from March 27 to April 7 was used in a propaganda video released on Thursday by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s Eastern Theater Command.
The video titled China, We Cannot Lose Even One Inch of It (中國，一點都不能少) showed photos from the second Sino-Japanese War and the surrender of Japanese forces in China, as well as Ma’s visit in Nanjing and a large billboard in Xiamen, China, bearing the slogan “one country, two systems, unite China.”
Captions in the video said that “Chinese soldiers stand firm in protecting the blood and family that cannot be lost” as a map of Taiwan was displayed, implying that people in Taiwan and China have “the same roots,” while the narrator reads a poem about “uniting against a foreign enemy.”
The video was released shortly after China ended its three-day military exercises around Taiwan following a meeting between President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and US House of Representatives Speaker Kevin McCarthy in Los Angeles the week before and on the same day that Beijing announced an investigation of Taiwan’s trade barriers on more than 2,400 Chinese products.
The timing of the video’s release and controversial remarks by Ma during his time in China have prompted criticism of the former president and his Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), including accusations that he was a tool for the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “united front” tactics and advocated Beijing’s “one China” principle.
Earlier this week, parents of students at Taipei Municipal Dunhua Elementary School were shocked to learn that a clip of the school’s choir singing a song conveying nostalgia for China had been screened in a Lunar New Year special aired by a Chinese state TV channel.
The choir were asked to perform We Sing the Same Song (我們同唱一首歌), which the Mainland Affairs Council has labeled a Chinese “united front” propaganda song. Three Taiwanese sang it in China Central Television’s Lunar New Year show last year, and China’s Taiwan Affairs Office has said the song “expresses Taiwanese people’s nostalgia and recognition to ancestors, and the blood-is-thicker-than-water kinship of people on both sides of the Strait.”
The video of the choir sparked an outcry, with people asking why children were used for Chinese “united front” propaganda. The school said that it had merely arranged a cultural exchange and the video had been edited.
While Ma and the school said their intentions were to promote cultural exchanges, the two videos highlight that for the CCP, everything is part of its plan to infiltrate all sectors of Taiwanese society.
Leaving aside the possibility that Ma and the KMT are working with the CCP to some extent, local governments, schools and the public must raise their awareness about China’s “united front” tactics.
Chinese-language news reports in 2019 said that more than 3,000 Taiwanese students visited China each summer on Chinese government-funded camps, tours and forums touted as “cultural and academic exchanges.” As COVID-19 restrictions were eased and national borders reopened, the tactics resumed, such as when dozens of Kaohsiung borough wardens were invited to China in February.
Academics have warned that “united front” and cognitive warfare campaigns are expected to increase ahead of next year’s presidential and legislative elections. If people lack the political literacy and awareness to recognize them, they might become the unwitting tools of propagandists.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS