A photograph of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) taking a deep bow before a statue of Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) while presenting a yellow floral wreath at the Republic of China founder’s mausoleum in Nanjing during his 12-day visit to China from March 27 to April 7 was used in a propaganda video released on Thursday by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s Eastern Theater Command.
The video titled China, We Cannot Lose Even One Inch of It (中國,一點都不能少) showed photos from the second Sino-Japanese War and the surrender of Japanese forces in China, as well as Ma’s visit in Nanjing and a large billboard in Xiamen, China, bearing the slogan “one country, two systems, unite China.”
Captions in the video said that “Chinese soldiers stand firm in protecting the blood and family that cannot be lost” as a map of Taiwan was displayed, implying that people in Taiwan and China have “the same roots,” while the narrator reads a poem about “uniting against a foreign enemy.”
The video was released shortly after China ended its three-day military exercises around Taiwan following a meeting between President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and US House of Representatives Speaker Kevin McCarthy in Los Angeles the week before and on the same day that Beijing announced an investigation of Taiwan’s trade barriers on more than 2,400 Chinese products.
The timing of the video’s release and controversial remarks by Ma during his time in China have prompted criticism of the former president and his Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), including accusations that he was a tool for the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “united front” tactics and advocated Beijing’s “one China” principle.
Earlier this week, parents of students at Taipei Municipal Dunhua Elementary School were shocked to learn that a clip of the school’s choir singing a song conveying nostalgia for China had been screened in a Lunar New Year special aired by a Chinese state TV channel.
The choir were asked to perform We Sing the Same Song (我們同唱一首歌), which the Mainland Affairs Council has labeled a Chinese “united front” propaganda song. Three Taiwanese sang it in China Central Television’s Lunar New Year show last year, and China’s Taiwan Affairs Office has said the song “expresses Taiwanese people’s nostalgia and recognition to ancestors, and the blood-is-thicker-than-water kinship of people on both sides of the Strait.”
The video of the choir sparked an outcry, with people asking why children were used for Chinese “united front” propaganda. The school said that it had merely arranged a cultural exchange and the video had been edited.
While Ma and the school said their intentions were to promote cultural exchanges, the two videos highlight that for the CCP, everything is part of its plan to infiltrate all sectors of Taiwanese society.
Leaving aside the possibility that Ma and the KMT are working with the CCP to some extent, local governments, schools and the public must raise their awareness about China’s “united front” tactics.
Chinese-language news reports in 2019 said that more than 3,000 Taiwanese students visited China each summer on Chinese government-funded camps, tours and forums touted as “cultural and academic exchanges.” As COVID-19 restrictions were eased and national borders reopened, the tactics resumed, such as when dozens of Kaohsiung borough wardens were invited to China in February.
Academics have warned that “united front” and cognitive warfare campaigns are expected to increase ahead of next year’s presidential and legislative elections. If people lack the political literacy and awareness to recognize them, they might become the unwitting tools of propagandists.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they