Following the discovery of a Formosan black bear carcass in a freezer in Pingtung County and a video showing two motorcyclists holding a dead bear between them as they drove along a road in December last year, the Pingtung District Prosecutors’ Office has investigated four bear killings, including the poaching of two female bears in the protected Shuang-guei Lake Major Wildlife Habitat.
It is high time that the judiciary meted out stricter punishments to poachers and investigate whether they are involved in illicit wildlife trade.
Granted, the number of injured Formosan black bears that have been nursed back to health and released into the wild has been rising, but so has the number of reported poachings — and the reports are only the tip of the iceberg.
Hunting Formosan black bears is considered taboo by 10 indigenous communities, including the Atayal, Taroko and Bunun. The recent poaching incidents violate indigenous traditions. Moreover, most of the guns used in the killings were not even registered.
People should refrain from harming wild animals, except in cases where there is an immediate threat to life or public safety, and report sightings to the authorities.
Pingtung prosecutors said they could not find any evidence suggesting the poached bears had posed any threat to human life or public safety that necessitated their killing. The Formosan black bear is listed as a protected species, so even if the animals had posed a threat to human life, people involved in the incidents should have shown extra restraint and alerted the authorities.
Over the past decade, 12 Formosan black bears have been reported killed by humans, while seven have been trapped by snares and eight have been injured with guns. Of the injured animals, 80 percent had their paws missing, a staggering ratio.
The numbers underscore the importance of achieving ecological sustainability and preserving the indigenous hunting culture. The government should step up measures regarding Formosan black bear preservation to avoid deliberate or accidental killing and improve reporting.
Although the government has been promoting selective snares, people can still easily buy foot-hold snares online, complete with instruction videos. As Formosan black bears roam over exceptionally large areas, there is a dire need for periodic reviews and policy adjustments. Before it revokes penalties for the accidental catching of Formosan black bears, the government should clearly lay out the legality of using traps and snares to protect the animals.
There are a few hundred Formosan black bears left in the wild in Taiwan. Analyses of the species have shown that the bears can withstand only minimal levels of hunting before facing risk of extinction. That is why the Taiwan Black Bear Conservation Association has said there should be no tolerance for harming or killing Formosan black bears.
After decades of efforts and preservation by government and private actors, things are finally looking up for Formosan black bears. Hopefully, the latest poaching incident would raise further awareness regarding the dire challenges that the bears face.
Hwang Mei-hsiu is chairwoman of the Taiwan Black Bear Conservation Association and a professor at National Pingtung University of Science and Technology.
Translated by Rita Wang
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS