Following the discovery of a Formosan black bear carcass in a freezer in Pingtung County and a video showing two motorcyclists holding a dead bear between them as they drove along a road in December last year, the Pingtung District Prosecutors’ Office has investigated four bear killings, including the poaching of two female bears in the protected Shuang-guei Lake Major Wildlife Habitat.
It is high time that the judiciary meted out stricter punishments to poachers and investigate whether they are involved in illicit wildlife trade.
Granted, the number of injured Formosan black bears that have been nursed back to health and released into the wild has been rising, but so has the number of reported poachings — and the reports are only the tip of the iceberg.
Hunting Formosan black bears is considered taboo by 10 indigenous communities, including the Atayal, Taroko and Bunun. The recent poaching incidents violate indigenous traditions. Moreover, most of the guns used in the killings were not even registered.
People should refrain from harming wild animals, except in cases where there is an immediate threat to life or public safety, and report sightings to the authorities.
Pingtung prosecutors said they could not find any evidence suggesting the poached bears had posed any threat to human life or public safety that necessitated their killing. The Formosan black bear is listed as a protected species, so even if the animals had posed a threat to human life, people involved in the incidents should have shown extra restraint and alerted the authorities.
Over the past decade, 12 Formosan black bears have been reported killed by humans, while seven have been trapped by snares and eight have been injured with guns. Of the injured animals, 80 percent had their paws missing, a staggering ratio.
The numbers underscore the importance of achieving ecological sustainability and preserving the indigenous hunting culture. The government should step up measures regarding Formosan black bear preservation to avoid deliberate or accidental killing and improve reporting.
Although the government has been promoting selective snares, people can still easily buy foot-hold snares online, complete with instruction videos. As Formosan black bears roam over exceptionally large areas, there is a dire need for periodic reviews and policy adjustments. Before it revokes penalties for the accidental catching of Formosan black bears, the government should clearly lay out the legality of using traps and snares to protect the animals.
There are a few hundred Formosan black bears left in the wild in Taiwan. Analyses of the species have shown that the bears can withstand only minimal levels of hunting before facing risk of extinction. That is why the Taiwan Black Bear Conservation Association has said there should be no tolerance for harming or killing Formosan black bears.
After decades of efforts and preservation by government and private actors, things are finally looking up for Formosan black bears. Hopefully, the latest poaching incident would raise further awareness regarding the dire challenges that the bears face.
Hwang Mei-hsiu is chairwoman of the Taiwan Black Bear Conservation Association and a professor at National Pingtung University of Science and Technology.
Translated by Rita Wang
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS