Following the discovery of a Formosan black bear carcass in a freezer in Pingtung County and a video showing two motorcyclists holding a dead bear between them as they drove along a road in December last year, the Pingtung District Prosecutors’ Office has investigated four bear killings, including the poaching of two female bears in the protected Shuang-guei Lake Major Wildlife Habitat.
It is high time that the judiciary meted out stricter punishments to poachers and investigate whether they are involved in illicit wildlife trade.
Granted, the number of injured Formosan black bears that have been nursed back to health and released into the wild has been rising, but so has the number of reported poachings — and the reports are only the tip of the iceberg.
Hunting Formosan black bears is considered taboo by 10 indigenous communities, including the Atayal, Taroko and Bunun. The recent poaching incidents violate indigenous traditions. Moreover, most of the guns used in the killings were not even registered.
People should refrain from harming wild animals, except in cases where there is an immediate threat to life or public safety, and report sightings to the authorities.
Pingtung prosecutors said they could not find any evidence suggesting the poached bears had posed any threat to human life or public safety that necessitated their killing. The Formosan black bear is listed as a protected species, so even if the animals had posed a threat to human life, people involved in the incidents should have shown extra restraint and alerted the authorities.
Over the past decade, 12 Formosan black bears have been reported killed by humans, while seven have been trapped by snares and eight have been injured with guns. Of the injured animals, 80 percent had their paws missing, a staggering ratio.
The numbers underscore the importance of achieving ecological sustainability and preserving the indigenous hunting culture. The government should step up measures regarding Formosan black bear preservation to avoid deliberate or accidental killing and improve reporting.
Although the government has been promoting selective snares, people can still easily buy foot-hold snares online, complete with instruction videos. As Formosan black bears roam over exceptionally large areas, there is a dire need for periodic reviews and policy adjustments. Before it revokes penalties for the accidental catching of Formosan black bears, the government should clearly lay out the legality of using traps and snares to protect the animals.
There are a few hundred Formosan black bears left in the wild in Taiwan. Analyses of the species have shown that the bears can withstand only minimal levels of hunting before facing risk of extinction. That is why the Taiwan Black Bear Conservation Association has said there should be no tolerance for harming or killing Formosan black bears.
After decades of efforts and preservation by government and private actors, things are finally looking up for Formosan black bears. Hopefully, the latest poaching incident would raise further awareness regarding the dire challenges that the bears face.
Hwang Mei-hsiu is chairwoman of the Taiwan Black Bear Conservation Association and a professor at National Pingtung University of Science and Technology.
Translated by Rita Wang
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS