The Ministry of Justice recently proposed to amend Article 1085 of the Civil Code, which states that “parents may, within the limit of necessity, inflict punishment upon their children.”
The proposal has generated much discussion in society. More than 6,000 cases of domestic violence were recorded in 2021, the Ministry of Health and Welfare said, adding that the most frequent type of violence was “improper physical treatment.”
Among the abusers, 80 percent either lacked parental knowledge or were accustomed to corporal punishment of children. Some other common factors include parents’ financial difficulties, intimate partner violence, mental health problems and drug abuse.
In a case of domestic violence against young children in 2021, the Hualien District Court ruled that despite the seriousness of child abuse, Taiwan has not abolished parents’ legal right to punish their children. Countries such as Germany and Japan have done so, and Taiwan should follow suit.
Although Taiwan has implemented the Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act (兒童及少年福利與權益保障法) and the Implementation Act of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (兒童權利公約施行法), which prohibit corporal punishment on children, parents’ legal right to punish children remains in the Civil Code.
Therefore, parents can inflict punishments such as beating, scolding, grounding and even fasting to discipline their children.
The legal system does not outlaw physical punishment of children in the household, and the key lies in whether a punishment complies with the “principle of proportionality,” which is often why abusers are not considered to break the law. The proposed amendment aims to eliminate domestic violence. The Ministry of Justice has emphasized that the law would not deprive parents of the right to discipline their children, but it would ban the use of violence.
The purpose of parental disciplinary power in the law is to discipline children, rather than to punish them. The amendment seeks to bring Taiwan in line with international human rights.
However, since most abusers lack knowledge of modern parenting, they rely on traditional methods used by previous generations. Consequently, they discipline their children through corporal punishment.
A fundamental solution requires collaboration between social, labor and education sectors. They should support the proposed amendment and respond to the public’s calls, working together to build a parent-friendly workplace, reduce tax burdens, provide financial aid, increase childcare services, promote family education and positive discipline. In doing so, a quality child-rearing environment can be created.
Chen Tien-ting is an educational administrator in Hsinchu City.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Much has been said about the significance of the recall vote, but here is what must be said clearly and without euphemism: This vote is not just about legislative misconduct. It is about defending Taiwan’s sovereignty against a “united front” campaign that has crept into the heart of our legislature. Taiwanese voters on Jan. 13 last year made a complex decision. Many supported William Lai (賴清德) for president to keep Taiwan strong on the world stage. At the same time, some hoped that giving the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) a legislative majority would offer a
RSS