The Ministry of Justice recently proposed to amend Article 1085 of the Civil Code, which states that “parents may, within the limit of necessity, inflict punishment upon their children.”
The proposal has generated much discussion in society. More than 6,000 cases of domestic violence were recorded in 2021, the Ministry of Health and Welfare said, adding that the most frequent type of violence was “improper physical treatment.”
Among the abusers, 80 percent either lacked parental knowledge or were accustomed to corporal punishment of children. Some other common factors include parents’ financial difficulties, intimate partner violence, mental health problems and drug abuse.
In a case of domestic violence against young children in 2021, the Hualien District Court ruled that despite the seriousness of child abuse, Taiwan has not abolished parents’ legal right to punish their children. Countries such as Germany and Japan have done so, and Taiwan should follow suit.
Although Taiwan has implemented the Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act (兒童及少年福利與權益保障法) and the Implementation Act of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (兒童權利公約施行法), which prohibit corporal punishment on children, parents’ legal right to punish children remains in the Civil Code.
Therefore, parents can inflict punishments such as beating, scolding, grounding and even fasting to discipline their children.
The legal system does not outlaw physical punishment of children in the household, and the key lies in whether a punishment complies with the “principle of proportionality,” which is often why abusers are not considered to break the law. The proposed amendment aims to eliminate domestic violence. The Ministry of Justice has emphasized that the law would not deprive parents of the right to discipline their children, but it would ban the use of violence.
The purpose of parental disciplinary power in the law is to discipline children, rather than to punish them. The amendment seeks to bring Taiwan in line with international human rights.
However, since most abusers lack knowledge of modern parenting, they rely on traditional methods used by previous generations. Consequently, they discipline their children through corporal punishment.
A fundamental solution requires collaboration between social, labor and education sectors. They should support the proposed amendment and respond to the public’s calls, working together to build a parent-friendly workplace, reduce tax burdens, provide financial aid, increase childcare services, promote family education and positive discipline. In doing so, a quality child-rearing environment can be created.
Chen Tien-ting is an educational administrator in Hsinchu City.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS