The Ministry of Justice recently proposed to amend Article 1085 of the Civil Code, which states that “parents may, within the limit of necessity, inflict punishment upon their children.”
The proposal has generated much discussion in society. More than 6,000 cases of domestic violence were recorded in 2021, the Ministry of Health and Welfare said, adding that the most frequent type of violence was “improper physical treatment.”
Among the abusers, 80 percent either lacked parental knowledge or were accustomed to corporal punishment of children. Some other common factors include parents’ financial difficulties, intimate partner violence, mental health problems and drug abuse.
In a case of domestic violence against young children in 2021, the Hualien District Court ruled that despite the seriousness of child abuse, Taiwan has not abolished parents’ legal right to punish their children. Countries such as Germany and Japan have done so, and Taiwan should follow suit.
Although Taiwan has implemented the Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act (兒童及少年福利與權益保障法) and the Implementation Act of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (兒童權利公約施行法), which prohibit corporal punishment on children, parents’ legal right to punish children remains in the Civil Code.
Therefore, parents can inflict punishments such as beating, scolding, grounding and even fasting to discipline their children.
The legal system does not outlaw physical punishment of children in the household, and the key lies in whether a punishment complies with the “principle of proportionality,” which is often why abusers are not considered to break the law. The proposed amendment aims to eliminate domestic violence. The Ministry of Justice has emphasized that the law would not deprive parents of the right to discipline their children, but it would ban the use of violence.
The purpose of parental disciplinary power in the law is to discipline children, rather than to punish them. The amendment seeks to bring Taiwan in line with international human rights.
However, since most abusers lack knowledge of modern parenting, they rely on traditional methods used by previous generations. Consequently, they discipline their children through corporal punishment.
A fundamental solution requires collaboration between social, labor and education sectors. They should support the proposed amendment and respond to the public’s calls, working together to build a parent-friendly workplace, reduce tax burdens, provide financial aid, increase childcare services, promote family education and positive discipline. In doing so, a quality child-rearing environment can be created.
Chen Tien-ting is an educational administrator in Hsinchu City.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
RSS