The Ministry of Justice recently proposed to amend Article 1085 of the Civil Code, which states that “parents may, within the limit of necessity, inflict punishment upon their children.”
The proposal has generated much discussion in society. More than 6,000 cases of domestic violence were recorded in 2021, the Ministry of Health and Welfare said, adding that the most frequent type of violence was “improper physical treatment.”
Among the abusers, 80 percent either lacked parental knowledge or were accustomed to corporal punishment of children. Some other common factors include parents’ financial difficulties, intimate partner violence, mental health problems and drug abuse.
In a case of domestic violence against young children in 2021, the Hualien District Court ruled that despite the seriousness of child abuse, Taiwan has not abolished parents’ legal right to punish their children. Countries such as Germany and Japan have done so, and Taiwan should follow suit.
Although Taiwan has implemented the Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act (兒童及少年福利與權益保障法) and the Implementation Act of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (兒童權利公約施行法), which prohibit corporal punishment on children, parents’ legal right to punish children remains in the Civil Code.
Therefore, parents can inflict punishments such as beating, scolding, grounding and even fasting to discipline their children.
The legal system does not outlaw physical punishment of children in the household, and the key lies in whether a punishment complies with the “principle of proportionality,” which is often why abusers are not considered to break the law. The proposed amendment aims to eliminate domestic violence. The Ministry of Justice has emphasized that the law would not deprive parents of the right to discipline their children, but it would ban the use of violence.
The purpose of parental disciplinary power in the law is to discipline children, rather than to punish them. The amendment seeks to bring Taiwan in line with international human rights.
However, since most abusers lack knowledge of modern parenting, they rely on traditional methods used by previous generations. Consequently, they discipline their children through corporal punishment.
A fundamental solution requires collaboration between social, labor and education sectors. They should support the proposed amendment and respond to the public’s calls, working together to build a parent-friendly workplace, reduce tax burdens, provide financial aid, increase childcare services, promote family education and positive discipline. In doing so, a quality child-rearing environment can be created.
Chen Tien-ting is an educational administrator in Hsinchu City.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS