The recent removal of items related to Japanese Shinto culture from the Taoyuan Martyrs’ Shrine and Cultural Park has caused an uproar. The complex was built as a Shinto shrine by the Japanese during the colonial period, but was transformed into a martyrs’ shrine commemorating veterans of the Chinese Civil War after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) retreated to Taiwan in 1949.
Figurines of the Japanese sun goddess Amaterasu Okami were allowed into the shrine for a cultural event last year, attracting throngs of visitors to see the Shinto decorations and practices. However, some people accused the Taoyuan City Government of “abandoning its ancestors” and “violating the spirit of the martyr’s shrine.” KMT Taoyuan Mayor Simon Chang (張善政) said that the government would dismantle the decorations and send the goddess back to Japan.
KMT Taoyuan City Councilor Niu Hsu-ting (牛煦庭) commended Taoyuan for its bold move, and said that the city’s former government was lacking judgement by allowing the Amaterasu figurines into the complex. However, DPP spokesman Chang Chih-hao (張志豪) said the removal was politically motivated, and that politicians should not resort to such ploys catering to anti-Japanese sentiment. Sankei Shimbun Taipei bureau chief Akio Yaita said that people in a democratic society should respect different religions, and that it has been a shame to see the removal.
The controversy is a manifestation of the ideologies and political affiliations embedded in Taiwanese society, as well as the Taoyuan government’s narrow vision for the city. After its retreat to Taiwan, the KMT has been a strong advocate of cultural cleansing. In 1974, it promulgated an act to erase imprints of Japanese culture, in which the first article called for the removal of all remains of Shinto shrines. The current removal simply falls in line with the party’s long-established anti-Japanese stance, and proves that it strongly clings to an outdated, feudal stance of being “Chinese.”
The KMT is also overlooking the congenial relationship Taiwan and Japan have built over the years, while ignoring the public’s friendly sentiment toward their northern neighbor. As most KMT members seemingly harbor anti-Japanese sentiment, the act of removal is much akin to the spirit of “Ah Q” in which one habitually resorts to ineffectual gestures to avenge for personal humiliations. In this case, the party is exerting dominance over a Japanese cultural symbol as if the shrine prevails over the nation.
As shrines can often take on ethnic and political inferences, it is fortunate that the Taoyuan Martyrs’ Shrine escaped the KMT’s “cleansing.” It has survived as one of the best-preserved examples of a Japanese Shinto shrine outside of Japan, and has been witness to Taiwan’s vibrant multicultural development.
Former Taoyuan mayor Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) pushed for the revitalization of historical monuments. The shrine was renovated for the purposes of cultural preservation and tourism, heightening its historical memory and heritage. The move should have been regarded as returning the shrine to its historical roots and restoring its connection to Japanese culture. Instead of being a “violation of the spirit of the martyr’s shrine,” as some KMT supporters said, the renovation was a manifestation of Taiwan’s diversity and respect for history and culture. The blending of a shrine for martyrs and Shinto worshipers would have also been a valuable attraction for tourists and locals alike.
Just as Taoyuan’s tourism is picking up again, Chang and KMT ideology are sabotaging an asset. Sacrificing the shrine at the altar of ideology, the party disregards the religion, values and beliefs of other cultures. If the KMT cannot put aside its anachronistic philosophies, then its leadership is no different than the communist party across the strait.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS