The International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant issued on Friday last week for Russian President Vladimir Putin delighted Uighurs, as Putin’s today signals Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) tomorrow.
The crimes committed by Xi are many times more serious than what Putin has been accused of.
Putin has caused more than 8 million people to flee Ukraine. By imprisoning more than 3 million Uighurs in concentration camps and restricting the movement of more than 10 million Uighurs, Xi has not only denied them the opportunity to live humanely, but also the opportunity to escape oppression.
The 8 million Ukrainians who fled their homeland and took refuge in Europe are lucky compared with the 15 million Uighurs who suffer under the occupation of East Turkestan, known as Xinjiang in China.
The ICC counted Putin’s bombing of Ukrainians for one year as one of his crimes. While Xi has not dropped bombs on Uighurs, he has broken up 1 million families through imprisonment, forced labor and forced sterilization.
The only difference between these murderers is that one can count the number of people Putin has killed: The UN recorded a civilian death toll of 8,231. With Xi, it is impossible to count, but he cannot hide them all.
The 700,000 detainees listed in Xinjiang police files only include people who were arrested in dozens of counties in East Turkestan. These people were captured because of their ethnic identity, because they were the original inhabitants of East Turkestan and because they refused to accept Sinicization.
That means the detainees in the files are prisoners of a smokeless war that has been going on for 70 years. While Putin has been rightly criticized many times for mistreating prisoners of war, Xi’s silent killing of prisoners is not even mentioned.
Although Xi has concealed the true number of those killed in the Uighur genocide, he cannot hide the genocidal orders he issued. Leaked documents exposed the order “to break their lineage, break their roots” and to show “absolutely no mercy” toward Uighurs.
Xi is blocking discussion of the Uighur issue at the UN, banning the publication of a Uighur report and not allowing an independent investigation of East Turkestan. Putin has not pleaded guilty, but Xi has on occasion unknowingly confessed.
For example: The 2017 and 2018 population statistics for China show that birth rates in Hotan Prefecture and the city of Kashgar plummeted.
German anthropologist Adrian Zanz concluded that 1 million fewer Uighurs were born during those two years — the peak of mass incarceration in the Uighur region. Putin might have killed 100,000 people, but Xi prevented 1 million Uighurs from coming into the world, killed many, and kept others in prisons and camps.
In Ukraine, houses have collapsed, but in East Turkestan, despite buildings still standing, 95 percent of the people inside the houses have been deprived of the right to live a normal life.
In some cases, the houses have even become tools of torture. Comparing the 44 Uighurs who died in the Urumqi fire caused by Xi’s COVID-19 lockdown policy with those who have died in during the bombing of Ukraine reflects the difference in the crimes committed by Xi and Putin.
More than 20 countries, including three members states of the UN Security Council, have recognized China’s policy on Uighurs as genocide or as at risk of causing genocide.
The EU and the UN have concluded that the situation is at risk of causing crimes against humanity.
Furthermore, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has committed the crime of 70 years of dictatorship over Chinese, and the death of 3 million people around the world from COVID-19, which originated in China.
By hiding the virus when it first emerged in China, Xi extended the damage and became the person to cause the largest death toll in the world.
It is only a matter of time before an arrest warrant is issued for Xi. The current ICC warrant should worry Xi more than it does Putin, as he is probably acutely aware that he will be next.
Kok Bayraq is a Uighur-American observer.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS