The Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) Tsai Pei-hui (蔡培慧) narrowly beat the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Lin Ming-chen (林明溱) in a legislative by-election in Nantou County on Saturday.
The victory is a boost for the DPP following a string of defeats at the polls, but it hardly assures the party victory in next year’s presidential election.
After suffering setbacks in last year’s nine-in-one elections, the Chiayi mayoral election and a legislative by-election in Taipei’s third electoral district, the DPP flipped a legislative seat with Tsai’s victory in Nantou, despite Lin, who had been a Nantou legislator and commissioner for more than a decade, having a comfortable lead in pre-election polls.
It is also the DPP’s first victory in the traditional KMT stronghold since the county was united as a single-seat electoral district in 2008.
The victory shows that DPP Chairman and Vice President William Lai (賴清德) can unite the party, and benefits his possible presidential bid.
The results of the by-election point to an electorate that used its voting power to punish Lin for his alleged involvement in several controversies, including abuse of privilege, and his failure to manage local affairs, such as garbage disposal, during his term as county commissioner, instead of one that embraced the DPP’s candidate.
Another likely factor was scare-mongering by the KMT, which told Nantou residents before the poll that “voting for the DPP would mean sending the youth to war.”
Although the slogan did not resonate with voters in the by-election, such extravagant claims about cross-strait issues would definitely hit closer to home ahead of national elections, especially after China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤) said Beijing would reach out to pro-China individuals and groups in Taiwan to promote “national unification,” and would “take concrete measures to support Taiwanese compatriots and help them resolve difficulties.”
China is once again using its tired carrot-and-stick strategy in an attempt to divide Taiwanese society: On the one hand, it is meeting with KMT members in Beijing and selectively retracting import bans on Taiwanese products to benefit the party, while on the other, it is using military threats to intimidate the DPP and shake Taiwanese’s trust in their government.
It is likely that the Chinese Communist Party will again aid China-friendly parties and politicians in Taiwan to help them gain ground in next year’s national elections.
Although the Nantou victory boosted the DPP’s spirits, the government has come under fire for its proposed amendments to the General Mobilization Act (全民防衛動員準備法), high inflation, a stagnant economy and slow recovery from COVID-19, which could cost the party the presidential seat.
However, the result could also be seen as a setback for the KMT and its potential presidential candidates, including KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), both of whom have been partly blamed for the loss.
The by-election’s outcome might serve as a lesson for the KMT to revise its election strategy, curb infighting and concentrate on choosing a strong presidential candidate to take on the DPP.
The by-election ended in a surprising reversal for the county’s local politics. It also unlocked a new phase for the presidential election, accompanied with more domestic and external influencing factors that should not be overlooked.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS