Quoting a US radio host’s Twitter post, a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has been peddling the idea that the “US plans to destroy Taiwan.” While the tweet was a satirical post made up by the host, it is precisely this kind of misinterpretation and dissemination of disinformation that could lead to the “destruction” of Taiwan.
The “US plans to destroy Taiwan” tweet was posted on Feb. 16 by Garland Nixon, a radio talk show host based in Washington and identified to be a journalist working for Russian state-run media Radio Sputnik. The post says: “Breaking News: White House insiders leak that, when asked if there could be any greater disaster than the neocon Ukraine project, President Biden responded, ‘wait until you see our plan for the destruction of Taiwan.’”
Former KMT legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元) translated Nixon’s satirical tweet into Chinese and posted it on Facebook. Tsai also appeared on pro-China TV shows saying he thinks Biden let slip the plan during a White House meeting.
Sensing an opportunity, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Wang Wenbin (汪文斌) said: “I also want to know what ‘the destruction of Taiwan’ plan is. The US should give a definitive explanation.” Meanwhile, Chinese state tabloid the Global Times wrote: “The US was reported to have been considering plans to destroy the island in the event of a military conflict between the island and the Chinese mainland.”
Nixon has been interviewed by an online influencer and confirmed that the Twitter post was meant to be satirical. The influencer said it was likely an example of something “lost in translation” and wondered why some Taiwanese did not check the accuracy of Twitter posts.
This case is a classic example of “cognitive warfare” aimed at intimidating Taiwan.
Nixon’s past tweets include one that says: “Breaking News: Taiwan government insider leaks that they have betrayed their citizens so dramatically that they may have to pay royalty right to the government of Norway for the use of the term ‘quisling.’” Tweets such as this are clearly jokes. However, for people who want to believe in disinformation, the truth is the last thing they would seek. In this case, individuals spreading and embellishing the quotes aim to promote “skepticism about the US” or propagate the conspiracy theory that the “US wants to destroy Taiwan.”
Disinformation has long been used as a tool by China, pro-China politicians and media to undermine Taiwan’s democracy and international relations. As US Representative Mike Gallagher, chair of the House of Representatives Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the US and the Chinese Communist Party, said: “The invasion has already begun in the cognitive space.”
A maxim often quoted in reference to Nazi propaganda states that: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” Today, China deploys the same tactic, with its repeated propaganda that Taiwan — which the People’s Republic of China has never governed — is “part of China.”
A more recent example is China’s 12-point peace plan for Ukraine. It lists respect for the sovereignty of all countries as the first priority, but Beijing also trumpets its “rock solid” relations with Russia, Ukraine’s invader. China itself has long been the major saboteur and intimidator of Taiwanese sovereignty.
Unlike Nixon’s tweet, the cognitive warfare against Taiwan and the international community is no joke.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily