Quoting a US radio host’s Twitter post, a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has been peddling the idea that the “US plans to destroy Taiwan.” While the tweet was a satirical post made up by the host, it is precisely this kind of misinterpretation and dissemination of disinformation that could lead to the “destruction” of Taiwan.
The “US plans to destroy Taiwan” tweet was posted on Feb. 16 by Garland Nixon, a radio talk show host based in Washington and identified to be a journalist working for Russian state-run media Radio Sputnik. The post says: “Breaking News: White House insiders leak that, when asked if there could be any greater disaster than the neocon Ukraine project, President Biden responded, ‘wait until you see our plan for the destruction of Taiwan.’”
Former KMT legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元) translated Nixon’s satirical tweet into Chinese and posted it on Facebook. Tsai also appeared on pro-China TV shows saying he thinks Biden let slip the plan during a White House meeting.
Sensing an opportunity, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Wang Wenbin (汪文斌) said: “I also want to know what ‘the destruction of Taiwan’ plan is. The US should give a definitive explanation.” Meanwhile, Chinese state tabloid the Global Times wrote: “The US was reported to have been considering plans to destroy the island in the event of a military conflict between the island and the Chinese mainland.”
Nixon has been interviewed by an online influencer and confirmed that the Twitter post was meant to be satirical. The influencer said it was likely an example of something “lost in translation” and wondered why some Taiwanese did not check the accuracy of Twitter posts.
This case is a classic example of “cognitive warfare” aimed at intimidating Taiwan.
Nixon’s past tweets include one that says: “Breaking News: Taiwan government insider leaks that they have betrayed their citizens so dramatically that they may have to pay royalty right to the government of Norway for the use of the term ‘quisling.’” Tweets such as this are clearly jokes. However, for people who want to believe in disinformation, the truth is the last thing they would seek. In this case, individuals spreading and embellishing the quotes aim to promote “skepticism about the US” or propagate the conspiracy theory that the “US wants to destroy Taiwan.”
Disinformation has long been used as a tool by China, pro-China politicians and media to undermine Taiwan’s democracy and international relations. As US Representative Mike Gallagher, chair of the House of Representatives Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the US and the Chinese Communist Party, said: “The invasion has already begun in the cognitive space.”
A maxim often quoted in reference to Nazi propaganda states that: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” Today, China deploys the same tactic, with its repeated propaganda that Taiwan — which the People’s Republic of China has never governed — is “part of China.”
A more recent example is China’s 12-point peace plan for Ukraine. It lists respect for the sovereignty of all countries as the first priority, but Beijing also trumpets its “rock solid” relations with Russia, Ukraine’s invader. China itself has long been the major saboteur and intimidator of Taiwanese sovereignty.
Unlike Nixon’s tweet, the cognitive warfare against Taiwan and the international community is no joke.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) last week made a rare visit to the Philippines, which not only deepened bilateral economic ties, but also signaled a diplomatic breakthrough in the face of growing tensions with China. Lin’s trip marks the second-known visit by a Taiwanese foreign minister since Manila and Beijing established diplomatic ties in 1975; then-minister Chang Hsiao-yen (章孝嚴) took a “vacation” in the Philippines in 1997. As Taiwan is one of the Philippines’ top 10 economic partners, Lin visited Manila and other cities to promote the Taiwan-Philippines Economic Corridor, with an eye to connecting it with the Luzon
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several