The US Department of State last month approved the sale of the M136 Volcano Vehicle-Launched Scatterable Mine System to Taiwan. The proposed sale should significantly boost Taiwan’s asymmetrical warfare capabilities and help undermine a possible landing by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA).
The Volcano dispenser contains 960 anti-tank mines and is capable of laying a minefield 1,100m long by 120m wide in four to 12 minutes.
However, the proposed sale has sparked concern from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and academics that it would turn Taiwan into “an island of mines.”
Academia Sinica’s Chu Yun-han (朱雲漢) said that “the US intended to Ukraine-ize Taiwan.” KMT Legislator Jessica Chen (陳玉珍) said that residents of Kinmen County have traumatic memories of landmines, as people have lost limbs after stepping on them. KMT Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) accused the US of planting landmines everywhere except its own soil.
Other questions were raised about whether the landmines contravene the Ottawa Treaty aimed at eliminating anti-personnel mines around the world.
Army Chief of Staff Lieutenant General Chang Yuan-hsun (章元勳) said that mines placed by the Volcano system do not target personnel, but vehicles such as tanks and trucks, so its use would not contravene the Ottawa Treaty.
As the landmines would be placed on the ground’s surface, rather than underground as with traditional mines, they would be easy for people to identify. The mines’ timed self-destruct capability also helps to minimize accidental triggers and casualties.
That the KMT has the habit of opposing every arms deal with the US is nothing new, but this latest opposition is an example of cognitive warfare, in line with Chinese ideology.
By spreading fearmongering notions of waking up to find landmines in Taiwan, or that children could easily step on them when they go to the beach, pro-China supporters feign to look out for the public interest, while withholding important information such as that the landmines would only be deployed as a last resort and only if an invasion occurs.
Their conflating of traditional, dangerous anti-personnel landmines used during the Second Taiwan Strait Crisis with the anti-tank mines in question is illogical and ignores that the two have different objectives. The hidden agenda behind these supporters is questionable.
The M136 system is defensive in nature. Taiwan would not need to procure landmines if China was not threatening it with military force in the first place, which reveals the victim-blaming mindset of pro-China supporters. Although war is to be prevented at all costs, if it were to occur, the volcano system would make Taiwan a tough nut to crack, slow down the enemy’s advance and buy the armed forces time to retaliate with concentrated power. As one of the most essential and low-cost weapons for conducting “David vs Goliath” asymmetrical warfare, the system would strengthen land defense in addition to air and naval defenses, which would increase the difficulty of a Chinese invasion.
By opposing the sale based on feigned humanistic concern for Taiwanese, pro-China supporters are cruel to the army, and sympathetic to the PLA and its facilitation of an invasion. This latest controversy has been a trial of the public’s political literacy and judgement — the public cannot afford to let its guard down regarding disinformation.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
The pan-blue camp in the era after the rule of the two Chiangs — former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — can be roughly divided into two main factions: the “true blue,” who insist on opposing communism to protect the Republic of China (ROC), and the “red-blue,” who completely reject the current government and would rather collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to control Taiwan. The families of the former group suffered brutally under the hands of communist thugs in China. They know the CPP well and harbor a deep hatred for it — the two
RSS