I fully approve of the structural changes the government has made to Taiwan’s military service system to enhance the battle preparedness of draftees.
However, there remains a lack of complementary provisions to cultivate a level of preparedness among the general public, such that any talk of “all-out national defense,” including the nation as a whole, remains empty words.
Despite the arrangements for the annual Wan An air drills — the series of military exercises and civil defense drills preparing Taiwanese for emergency situations — the majority of the public are still going about their everyday lives as if there is no immediate danger.
The exercises do not involve members of the public, notably women and citizens too young to have gone through military service, in any substantial way. There is very little classroom instruction, let alone practical application, pertaining to important aspects such as evacuation in times of war, objects and equipment that should be carried or coordination between the armed forces and the general public.
It is no exaggeration to say that Taiwan is ill-prepared, in terms of required equipment and facilities as well as a legal framework, to deal with public threats, be they earthquakes and other natural disasters or an imminent military attack.
Taiwan would do well to learn a thing or two from the approach taken in Germany.
I have been an assistant instructor in chemistry departments in German universities, and the classes in these departments include compulsory attendance of fire drills.
University students and faculty, often more than100 participants at a time, are expected to enter a smoke-filled room equipped with water or fire extinguishers and put out the source of fires in several locations. In some circumstances, firefighters demonstrate how to put out materials set ablaze for the purpose by patting out the flames with their bare hands.
Some people attempted to avoid participating in some of the more dangerous-looking activities for one excuse or the other, but my colleagues said that they all had a go. One particularly memorable instance was when a firefighter, wearing protective clothing, set his own back alight and ran around shouting frantically, simulating a scene in which a person was on fire, and the students were required to run after him and extinguish the flames.
The reason for this dramatic display was to teach people how to calmly deal with a similar situation should they be faced with it, providing them with the required experience and confidence to do so.
By comparison, the drills in which I have participated in Taiwan generally involve people watching pre-recorded videos, and even though firefighters are present, they are rarely required to become involved.
When even fire drills are handled in such a superficial manner, one can only imagine what members of the public would do when faced with a major, complex situation such as a military invasion by China.
Experts have said that people on an island lacking sufficient battle preparedness or understanding of what could happen should war break out would easily succumb when the unthinkable happens.
The government should provide detailed measures to deal with emergent situations, be they natural disasters or imminent war, and arrange for the participation of the general public in drills, It should also bolster military-civilian exchanges to ensure that people know what to do when disaster strikes and have the confidence to do it. This is what might be called “all-out national defense.”
Kao Chih-yun is a doctoral student studying in Germany.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS