Local solar product manufacturers have said that their businesses are at risk if the government does not crack down on illegal solar modules made with cheap cells from China. Last year, solar panels imported through a third country were used in about 30 percent of solar installations, indicating that the government’s efforts to seize illegal solar products were ineffective. That could add to roadblocks in the country’s efforts to reduce carbon emissions by 2050.
Two gigawatts of solar systems were deployed in Taiwan last year. About 0.6 gigawatts of that power came from solar panels imported through third countries, primarily Southeast Asian nations, industry sources said.
Local solar companies said that it is impossible to compete with those imports, as they were 10 to 30 percent cheaper than domestic products, making them extremely attractive to solar energy developers. The wide price gaps mean that the government’s 6 percent increase in feed-in tariffs for adopting Taiwan-made solar panels is unlikely to spur domestic purchases.
It is highly suspicious that those third-country solar modules were equipped with Chinese solar cells, as China’s major solar companies have allocated their production to Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand or Malaysia to leverage cheap labor in those countries. That shift came as a result of rising Chinese labor costs and stricter environmental rules in China.
Chinese manufacturers of solar cells are under pressure to find a new market after Washington in June last year blocked them from entering the US, to prevent low-cost Chinese products from harming the viability of the US solar supply chain. Analysts believe that Taiwan has become China’s new target market, as the government offers decent tariffs to encourage renewable energy generation.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs last year started requiring importers to submit certificates of origin for solar equipment. Solar energy developers that fail to abide by the requirement could lose their permits to supply electricity.
However, the rules do not stop solar panels made in Southeast Asia from entering Taiwan. During the first 11 months of last year, solar module imports surged 42-fold to a record high from 2021, industry sources said. Even though those imported solar panels were made in Southeast Asia, it is not easy to identify whether the solar cells inside them were made by Chinese companies.
With few effective methods to safeguard their interests and profits, some solar companies have considered slowing their local investment or capacity expansion and scouting overseas sites. One local solar company has said it has delayed new investment in manufacturing next-generation solar products in Taiwan because the market cannot afford the more expensive devices.
Price competition could intensify this year, as the US considers more restrictions on Chinese solar imports.
Taiwan is heavily reliant on energy imports. A slowdown in solar investment would imperil the country’s goal of reaching zero carbon emissions by 2050. The government’s plan requires energy from renewable sources, particularly solar energy, which is to make up a big portion of Taiwan’s energy supply over the next few years.
Realistically, the government should step up its crackdown on the illegal use of Chinese solar cells, allowing local solar companies to grow with the country’s energy transformation. Solar companies have to do their best to improve manufacturing costs and shrink the gap with their Chinese rivals.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS