With its inventive videos and bizarre memes, TikTok once billed itself as “the last sunny corner on the Internet.” Since launching five years ago, the app has become a global sensation, amassing millions of users every year.
Despite delighting consumers and advertisers, others believe the “sunny” app has a dark side. As ByteDance is the parent company of TikTok and is headquartered in China — a nation whose government is known for surveillance and propaganda — its ownership has triggered fear about it becoming a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) tool for tracking people worldwide and censoring content.
Due to national security concerns, India made the first move to ban TikTok and dozens of other Chinese apps in 2020. On Dec. 5, Taiwan barred the app on public-sector devices, followed by the US Senate unanimously approving a bill on Wednesday last week to prohibit federal government employees from downloading the Chinese app.
There have also been calls to censor or ban the app in the private sector. Minister Without Portfolio and Executive Yuan spokesman Lo Ping-cheng (羅秉成) said more public discussion is needed to determine whether Taiwan should draft laws to completely ban the use of TikTok across the nation, as India and other countries have done.
While some legislators warmed to the idea of extending the ban from government employees to everyone, it also attracted ferocious opposition, with the main argument being that it would undermine democracy and freedom of speech.
However, as a nation under constant Chinese threat, the government has all the more responsibility to look out for the potential dangers and threats of TikTok, more so than India or even the US. The app is most popular among teenagers, who use it as a main source of news and entertainment, which heavily influences their outlook on the world.
As nations have pointed out, TikTok allows China to manipulate what the app’s vast foreign users can see. The threat is not about the harvesting of user data, but what its users learn from it. As the app’s algorithm was developed in Beijing, a tweak here or there could give more traction to videos in line with Chinese propaganda.
It is easy to stumble upon false information on the app, such as videos implying that Ukraine is at fault for its invasion by Russia. It also censors content that is politically sensitive to the Chinese government, such as the Tiananmen Square Massacre, Tibet and Taiwan. For an age group that is susceptible to manipulation, the app is a perfect tool for spreading pro-China ideology, propaganda and could influence national identity.
On a deeper linguistic level, along with the influence of other Chinese social media platforms, many Taiwanese have started using “Chinese” Mandarin in daily speech, such as saying “shipin” (視頻) rather than the more common “yingpian” (影片) when referring to “videos” in Taiwan.
In the words of US Senator Ted Cruz, TikTok is “a Trojan horse the Chinese Communist Party can use to influence what Americans see, hear and ultimately think.” There is no denying that TikTok, if left unchecked, could present a risk to Taiwan, especially among young people without the experience to tell true from false.
Without new safety mechanisms or other regulating measures, TikTok could easily become another seemingly innocuous yet powerful tool in China’s cognitive warfare against Taiwan. As one of the most vibrant democracies in the world, the government cannot afford to ignore the risks. While protecting freedom of speech, it also has to ensure that communication tools do not end up becoming the enemy’s fodder to chip away at Taiwan’s democracy and national identity.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS