The Chinese government on Wednesday announced 10 new COVID-19 response guidelines for easing its stringent pandemic restrictions, sending a clear signal that it is drastically changing its almost three years of enforcing a strict “zero COVID-19” policy.
The relaxed measures were introduced days after protests broke out in major cities and campuses across China against “zero COVID-19” rules — repeated lockdowns, mass testing and forced quarantine — with protesters urging the government to lift its strict control measures, while also displaying dissent against censorship.
Some of the biggest changes include allowing home quarantine for infected people with mild or no symptoms, limiting lockdowns to “high-risk areas” for shorter periods, a strict ban on blocking fire exits and doors, scrapping the requirement to show a negative test result or health code for many venues and domestic travel, and a government vow to accelerate vaccination among the elderly.
Chinese officials and state-controlled media have dramatically shifted their tone, emphasizing that the Omicron subvariant of SARS-CoV-2 is weaker than previous strains and that most cases are either asymptomatic or have mild symptoms. They said that the policy adjustments are “science-based,” and blamed excessive control measures on local officials.
“The country is facing a new situation and new tasks in epidemic prevention and control as the pathogenicity of the Omicron virus weakens, more people are vaccinated and experience in containing the virus has been accumulated,” Chinese Vice Premier Sun Chunlan (孫春蘭) said last week.
Over the past few days, Chinese media have repeatedly broadcast interviews or cited specialists saying that Omicron “is not scary,” as the vast majority of infected people can fully recover, it has a lower risk of causing severe illness and the fatality rate is much lower than that of previous variants.
However, public health experts in other countries have expressed concerns that the Chinese government has not done enough to prepare for a large-scale outbreak, with an expected surge in severe cases and deaths, while many Chinese seem to be confused and uncertain about what lies ahead — millions of lives could be at stake.
Although uncertainty persists around China’s low vaccine uptake among the elderly, insufficient intensive care units, uneven distribution of healthcare resources and low virus exposure, many experts are watching carefully, but do not seem worried about the direct effect a surge in cases in China could have on other countries, as travel has been curbed due to China’s tight border controls.
However, with more than 150,000 Taiwanese registered as living in China last year, and many businesspeople and students traveling between Taiwan and China, Beijing’s sudden COVID-19 policy changes have left Taiwanese asking if it could bring a new wave of infections to the nation.
The Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) and several health experts said that Taiwan has experienced two waves of Omicron infections this year, with more than 8.3 million people having been infected and a high two-dose vaccination rate of 88.6 percent, with booster coverage of 74.4 percent, so Taiwanese have some protection against the virus.
However, the CECC warned that as most countries experienced overwhelmed healthcare systems when faced with large outbreaks, people intending to travel to China should be cautious, and be aware that medical and other essential services could be disrupted. A surge in cases could crowd out non-COVID-19 healthcare services, so vulnerable or unvaccinated people are advised to reconsider travel plans to China, and to use healthcare services in Taiwan.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
No state has ever formally recognized the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) as a legal entity. The reason is not a lack of legitimacy — the CTA is a functioning exile government with democratic elections and institutions — but the iron grip of realpolitik. To recognize the CTA would be to challenge the People’s Republic of China’s territorial claims, a step no government has been willing to take given Beijing’s economic leverage and geopolitical weight. Under international law, recognition of governments-in-exile has precedent — from the Polish government during World War II to Kuwait’s exile government in 1990 — but such recognition