The Council of Agriculture on Thursday said that China is blocking imports of seafood products from more than 100 Taiwanese exporters. The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on the same day said it would not speculate whether the ban was politically motivated, but that is really a moot point. The main concern is that, regardless of motivation, China continues to impose arbitrary bans on Taiwanese exports.
Last year it banned Taiwanese pineapples, wax apples and sugar apples, and in June it banned groupers. After a visit to Taipei in August by US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, it banned largehead hairtail, citrus fruits and other items. The bans were politically motivated — particularly the bans following Pelosi’s visit, something China has admitted.
However, if the issues the 100 most recently affected exporters are facing stem from political matters, then China’s timing could not be more strange given the Democratic Progressive Party’s poor performance in last month’s local elections.
The MAC said the issue appears to be related to import regulations that China introduced at the start of the year, requiring that the food storage and processing facilities of importers from all countries be registered with the Chinese government.
The issue has caused trade disputes with many countries, the MAC said.
However, Taiwan has the leverage to turn things around in its trade disputes with China. Beijing puts pressure on Taiwanese food exporters at its whim, but avoids disrupting “the flow of Taiwanese-made processor chips needed by Chinese factories that assemble the world’s smartphones and other electronics,” The Associated Press wrote on Aug. 4.
“Taiwan plays an outsized role in the chip industry for an island of 24.5 million people, accounting for more than half the global supply,” the AP said, adding: “Chips are China’s biggest import at more than [US]$400 billion a year, ahead of crude oil.”
The government should threaten to cut the supply of chips to China if Beijing continues its unfair trade practices. Companies such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) make their most advanced chips in Taiwan and have facilities that make advanced chips outside of China, exemplified by TSMC’s planned plant in Phoenix, Arizona. More factories could also be built in other countries closer to Taiwan.
Food producers could also help themselves by cutting dependence on the Chinese market. One of the fish exports most recently affected by a Chinese ban is largehead hairtail, but annual exports of the fish to China in 2015 were only about 36 tonnes, which increased to 13,720 tonnes in 2018. In 2019 there were calls to further increase exports of the fish to China by bypassing customs in Kinmen County and shipping directly to Xiamen.
A petition to stop the plan said that it would result in overfishing and increased domestic prices, while urging fisheries authorities to focus on the domestic market. The woes of largehead hairtail exporters facing a China ban appear to be at least somewhat self-created. They could focus on the domestic market, as conservationists have urged them to do, or explore other markets, such as Japan.
Fruit growers have had great success in transitioning to the Japanese and US markets. The Central News Agency on Thursday last week reported that “Japan has overtaken China to become the largest importer of fruit from Taiwan this year,” while exports to the US of Taiwanese fruit, fruit juices, tea, cassava starch, pastries and snacks increased 40 percent this year from last year.
Taiwanese fisheries must wean themselves off the Chinese market as soon as possible. Failure to do so would result in continued suffering due to Beijing’s arbitrary actions.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS