Industrialization expanded into Asia over many decades after beginning in Europe.
As a result, Asians have shifted from their traditional working and life styles to Western styles. Many Asian countries, such as Taiwan, South Korea and Japan, have become industrial societies, and traditional working methods have been abandoned.
British journalist Gideon Rachman writes in his 2017 book Easternization: Asia’s Rise and America’s Decline from Obama to Trump and Beyond that Asian countries are growing in wealth and power, while those of Western countries are declining.
Therefore, many people question where the center of global power will be in the 21st century, Rachman writes.
The growing power of populous Asian countries such as China and India are increasingly influencing the lives of people around the world.
However, the important issues for the 21st century are not only on the growing power of Eastern countries, but also other critical issues that affect the survival of the humanity, such as climate change and sustainable development.
The term “sustainable development” was in 1987 defined by the UN as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”
The influence of Westernization throughout the world means that people’s lifestyles rely on excessive consumption and that the world’s natural resources are strained. This could thwart the ability of future generations to use or consume natural resources. Wars, whether internally or between countries, have negative effects on the lives of people and environments.
The focus on “power over others” might need to shift to “relations with each other” to protect the planet and the survival of humanity. All nations should seek the means needed to save the world instead of fighting each other. This is because a changing environment in one country can affect other parts of the world.
The collaboration between countries is necessary for creating and implementing good strategies to prevent the end of the world. They must ensure that their policies and practices do not harm global society.
The best practices in dealing with climate change and achieving sustainable development should be shared among countries within their region and beyond.
Phathara-on Wesarat is head of the Bachelor of Business Administration Program in the faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences at Prince of Songkla University in Thailand.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS