Industrialization expanded into Asia over many decades after beginning in Europe.
As a result, Asians have shifted from their traditional working and life styles to Western styles. Many Asian countries, such as Taiwan, South Korea and Japan, have become industrial societies, and traditional working methods have been abandoned.
British journalist Gideon Rachman writes in his 2017 book Easternization: Asia’s Rise and America’s Decline from Obama to Trump and Beyond that Asian countries are growing in wealth and power, while those of Western countries are declining.
Therefore, many people question where the center of global power will be in the 21st century, Rachman writes.
The growing power of populous Asian countries such as China and India are increasingly influencing the lives of people around the world.
However, the important issues for the 21st century are not only on the growing power of Eastern countries, but also other critical issues that affect the survival of the humanity, such as climate change and sustainable development.
The term “sustainable development” was in 1987 defined by the UN as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”
The influence of Westernization throughout the world means that people’s lifestyles rely on excessive consumption and that the world’s natural resources are strained. This could thwart the ability of future generations to use or consume natural resources. Wars, whether internally or between countries, have negative effects on the lives of people and environments.
The focus on “power over others” might need to shift to “relations with each other” to protect the planet and the survival of humanity. All nations should seek the means needed to save the world instead of fighting each other. This is because a changing environment in one country can affect other parts of the world.
The collaboration between countries is necessary for creating and implementing good strategies to prevent the end of the world. They must ensure that their policies and practices do not harm global society.
The best practices in dealing with climate change and achieving sustainable development should be shared among countries within their region and beyond.
Phathara-on Wesarat is head of the Bachelor of Business Administration Program in the faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences at Prince of Songkla University in Thailand.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS