Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei mayoral candidate Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) has proposed reinstating 30 minutes of free YouBike rental. Shortly after, independent Taipei mayoral candidate Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) called the proposal a “blockhead” idea.
Is Huang’s criticism fair? It is true that Chiang is relatively inexperienced in politics, but the more important question is how competent a person is he.
In the Taipei mayoral TV debate, Chiang repeatedly bragged about being a “Silicon Valley lawyer.”
However, US professor Tario Ong (翁達瑞) has said that Chiang had been suspended from practicing law in the US three times.
United Microelectronics Corp (UMC) founder Robert Tsao (曹興誠) also roasted Chiang, saying that his work at a law firm of which UMC was a client only involved setting up files and delivering documents.
Crestfallen and disgraced, Chiang resigned as legislator to change the discussion and to show his commitment to becoming mayor.
His leadership abilities have been the subject of small talk.
In an interpellation session in the legislature, Chiang was left speechless by remarks by Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), and in a radio interview with television producer Wang Wei-chung (王偉忠) he was left tongue-tied, even though Wang kept feeding him openings to respond.
Huang’s criticism is fair if other proposals Chiang has made are also considered, such as a bus-seat reservation scheme, a “rides for squats” plan and air-conditioner rentals for classrooms.
On those issues, she was right. They were blockhead ideas.
Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) gives off the impression that he has his sights set on the Presidential Office, with little patience for distractions such as governing Taipei.
However, Chiang has a long way to go to prove that he is anything other than a pampered rich kid. As a Taipei resident, I have experienced eight years of stagnation under Ko, and I sincerely hope Chiang will not be the city’s next mayor.
Sophia Lee is a member of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS