Some governments, such as Syria and Myanmar, kill their own people. Some, such as Russia, kill people in other countries, as in Ukraine.
Iran’s government is doing both, home and away.
Now, pressed into action by this murderous regime, Iran’s national soccer team is about to play England, Wales and the US in the FIFA World Cup — as if nothing untoward were happening. This is not OK. In truth, it is shameful.
To assist fans traveling to Qatar for the England v Iran match on Monday next week and other Group B fixtures, here is a brief program guide to recent events off the pitch.
Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish Iranian, was beaten to death in police custody in Tehran in September after her arrest for allegedly breaking rules on mandatory head-coverings. In the ensuing nationwide protests — which are continuing — Iran’s security forces have killed hundreds of people and detained nearly 10,000. Demands for reform have been rejected out of hand.
Hardliners say the demonstrators should be executed. That would be nothing out of the ordinary for a regime notorious for human rights abuses, foreign hostage-taking and assassination plots.
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei does not stop at terrorizing young women. By supplying swarms of “kamikaze” drones to Russia, and reportedly ballistic missiles, too, the aging dictator is helping Russian President Vladimir Putin’s forces kill and maim Ukrainian children and create a humanitarian disaster this winter.
Khamenei’s regime, which has military ties to North Korea and Syria, as well as Russia, and is regarded by Israel as an existential threat, appears determined to acquire nuclear weapons-making capability. Tehran stalled last-ditch European efforts to revive the 2015 UN-backed nuclear deal. Experts say Iran can now produce enough fissile material to build a bomb in less than seven days.
Iran’s players are uncomfortably aware of regime efforts to use soccer (and them) to present a normal face to the world and distract attention from the crisis at home. Sardar Azmoun, a star striker, castigated the mullahs on Instagram.
“Shame on you for so easily killing our people and long live the women of Iran,” he wrote.
Teammates have also criticized the regime.
Yet there is little doubt that Team Melli, as the national side is known, will show up in Doha. Penalties for refusing to play would be fearsome and there appears no prospect of a boycott. For different reasons, the England, US and Wales teams will also presumably do as they are told.
National prestige and a great deal of money are at stake. Politically speaking, it would be next to impossible to pull out now. Humanly speaking, it is sickening.
How is it acceptable to play games with a nation at war with its own people and, indirectly, with you and your friends?
FIFA president Gianni Infantino gave his tin-eared answer this month. He pleaded with the 32 nations competing in Qatar to “focus on the football” and leave “politics” out of it.
“We know football does not live in a vacuum,” Infantino wrote. “But please do not allow football to be dragged into every ideological or political battle that exists ... At FIFA, we try to respect all opinions and beliefs, without handing out moral lessons to the rest of the world.”
Given its history of corruption and racketeering, the idea of FIFA handing out “moral lessons” to anyone is laughable, but set that to one side for now.
Significantly, Infantino did not address calls for Iran to be thrown out of the World Cup and he also ignored the quintessentially political action taken by FIFA itself in February, when it excluded Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. Other precedents include ostracism of apartheid-era South Africa and the banning of the Yugoslavia/Serbia team from international tournaments in 1992.
The bizarre yet persistent idea that sport can somehow isolate itself, or be absolved, from the political and socioeconomic order in which it has its being underpins the flawed approach of World Cup hosts Qatar — a close ally of Iran.
This “don’t look up” strategy has inevitably sucked Qatar into controversy over migrant workers’ rights and, more recently, over archaic attitudes to LGBTQ+ fans. An offensive claim last week by a Qatari World Cup “ambassador” that homosexuality arises from “damage in the mind” crystallized the problem.
Despite some progress, “human rights abuses [in Qatar] persist on a significant scale,” Amnesty International reported last month.
“If Gianni Infantino wants the world to ‘focus on the football’ ... FIFA could finally start tackling serious human rights issues rather than brushing them under the carpet,” Amnesty International head of economic and social justice Steve Cockburn said. “It is astonishing they still have not done so.”
Ten European soccer associations, including England and Wales, are demanding FIFA and Qatar do more. A joint statement included an important, even historic declaration.
“Embracing diversity and tolerance also means supporting human rights. Human rights are universal and they apply everywhere,” it said.
That is certainly true. So if for no other reason, consistency requires that Saudi Arabia, another World Cup qualifier and serial human rights abuser, also face harsher scrutiny.
The Saudi Arabian regime has turned Qatar-style “sportwashing” — reputation laundering — into a successful industry through lavish sponsorship of international sporting events and the purchase of the English Premier League club Newcastle United.
Yet egregious Saudi Arabian human rights abuses, including mass executions and torture, persist. Will the wrongfully jailed Leeds University student, Salma al-Shehab, and other Saudi Arabian and Iranian political prisoners be watching the soccer from their cells? Unlikely.
Scrub the paeans to “universal rights.” Forget hyped-up talk of an “exceptional global carnival” and “unprecedented festival of football.”
As a spectacle of human self-deception, disassociation and blatant hypocrisy, the World Cup is a genuine world-beater.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath