A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance.
Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials.
That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath of the April 3 earthquake drew criticism that Fu, a legislator elected from Hualien County who is the county’s former commissioner, and other members of the group are neglecting their duties.
On the other hand, Fu displayed his arrogance by threatening Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers not to hold any voting while they are away, saying that the KMT, which has one seat more than the DPP in the Legislative Yuan, would retaliate.
In this legislative session that began in February, the KMT caucus has consistently been incompetent and arrogant. In one case, it violated the legislature’s procedures and called for an extraordinary meeting, only to call it an error later and blame a party staff member. There are many other instances, including KMT legislators reprimanding government officials and calling them “subordinates to legislators,” and earlier this month erroneously counting KMT Legislator Sasuyu Ruljuwan (盧縣一) in a vote on pension reform despite him being in China that day, which the party blamed on a Legislative Yuan worker; and proposing to amend laws restricting the allocation of special budgets, then proposing a draft act for the construction of an expressway connecting Hualien and Taitung, which is unconstitutional.
Moreover, the announced visit is happening just after former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the KMT met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, where Xi said that “external interference cannot stop the historical trend of reunion of the country and family,” and Ma echoed him by saying people of the two sides of the Strait belong to the Chinese nation.
The visit is also on the eve of president-elect William Lai (賴清德) of the DPP taking office on May 20 and at a time when Beijing is intensifying its pressure on Taiwan through multifaceted tools of coercion to demonstrate its disapproval of Lai, who it calls a “troublemaker” and a “separatist.”
Considering there is no urgent agenda and that it is taking place at a sensitive time, the purpose of the visit is questionable.
Fu and the KMT legislators’ visit seems to serve the same purpose as Ma’s, which served China’s interests by helping it signal to the world that Beijing can be friendly and have peaceful dialogue with Taiwan if the nation accepts the “one China” principle. It would also help the party convey the message to Taiwanese that only the KMT is capable of bringing peace and prosperity across the Taiwan Strait.
KMT Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) has visited China eight times since he took the post in 2021, and the media have reported that Beijing has invited the party’s other high-ranking officials and Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to visit this year. Whether KMT politicians’ visits to China are really in Taiwan’s interest, or simply serve Beijing by helping it send the “one China” message to the world, needs to be scrutinized.
Many foreigners, particularly Germans, are struck by the efficiency of Taiwan’s administration in routine matters. Driver’s licenses, household registrations and similar procedures are handled swiftly, often decided on the spot, and occasionally even accompanied by preferential treatment. However, this efficiency does not extend to all areas of government. Any foreigner with long-term residency in Taiwan — just like any Taiwanese — would have encountered the opposite: agencies, most notably the police, refusing to accept complaints and sending applicants away at the counter without consideration. This kind of behavior, although less common in other agencies, still occurs far too often. Two cases
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
RSS