Energy prices in Europe have soared since Russia invaded Ukraine in February. On July 8, the European Parliament voted in favor of classifying natural gas and nuclear power as environmentally sustainable economic activities in the EU’s Complementary Climate Delegated Act, which governs the EU taxonomy of sustainable finance and allows the issue of bonds and preferential loans for related investments.
Germany, which relies on Russia for most of its natural gas supply, has been seeking alternative energy sources from the Middle East and South Africa. In August, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz visited Norway to secure more supplies.
Late last month, Germany announced that two out of its three remaining nuclear reactors, which were scheduled to be shut down at the end of this year, would remain in operation for at least another four months.
In Taiwan, we have seen some alternative interpretations of how the EU has been managing this energy crisis.
When the European Parliament’s resolution was announced, Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) said: “The EU has decided to treat nuclear power as green energy. Opposing nuclear power used to be right, but now it is wrong.”
Online news outlet Storm Media (風傳媒) went further with an editorial asking: “Now that the EU has decided to regard nuclear power as green energy, and various countries are starting to increase their use of nuclear power, should Taiwan reconsider and adjust its policies regarding this source of energy, or will nothing change until a new government comes into office?”
Whatever intentions or time constraints they might have had, both commentators omit the many provisos in the resolution. For example, the restrictions placed on nuclear power plants — such as technology, fuel and nuclear waste disposal — as well as requirements to replace coal-fired power stations, and the sunset clause that requires construction of nuclear power plants to be completed by 2045.
The EU has essentially only applied the financial conditions afforded to green energy sources to natural gas and nuclear energy. No European country has modified its energy policies as a result of this decision. In other words, this is an emergency relief measure for the EU, not a sharp U-turn in major decisions regarding nuclear energy. It does not entail a sudden turnaround from opposition to enthusiastic support for nuclear energy.
Germany’s goal for 100 percent renewable energy by 2050 has not changed because of Russia’s war in Ukraine. As for France, last year, 69 percent of its energy came from nuclear power, but it aims to reduce this figure to 30 percent by 2050, with the other 70 percent coming from renewable energy sources.
The Oct. 8 edition of CommonWealth Magazine includes a report about various problems that France has had this year with its nuclear energy. The article asks why a “nuclear power revival” is hard to achieve and mentions bottlenecks that have recently affected new developments in nuclear technology, such as small modular reactors.
Taiwan’s nuclear power advocates believe that nuclear energy has two major selling points — low cost and stability. Data published by Ember Climate in January showed that the average wholesale electricity prices per megawatt-hour were 211.60 euros in France and 167.90 euros in Germany.
The price peaked in August at 493 euros in France and 469.30 euros in Germany before falling last month to 393.60 euros in France and 360.20 euros in Germany. Throughout the year, France’s electricity prices and the increase compared with last year were higher than that in Germany.
France buys electricity from Germany during the peak time for annual repairs to its nuclear power plants. In previous years, France bought electricity from Germany in winter, but this year it did so in summer, partly because at the end of last year nuclear safety authorities ordered some power stations to shut down all their reactors for maintenance.
In addition, high temperatures and drought caused some power plants to suspend operations because they could not access river water for their cooling systems. Having bet so heavily on nuclear power, France could suffer a greater impact than Germany — which has more diverse sources of electrical power — if systematic problems arise. In 2012, Germany generated 40.9 percent of its electricity from renewable sources, 27.9 percent from coal, 15.3 percent from natural gas and 11.9 percent from nuclear power.
Some people insist on comparing Taiwan to Ukraine but do not think about what would happen if Taiwanese nuclear power plants were bombed.
Taiwan’s energy policy can be very simple. First, go non-nuclear. Given that nuclear power provides only 5.6 percent of Taiwan’s energy demands, it would not be difficult to replace. Second, spread the risk by maintaining diverse energy sources such as natural gas, coal and oil.
Among the various options, the higher the proportion of renewable energy, the safer Taiwan would be. As Deputy Minister of Economic Affairs Tseng Wen-sheng (曾文生) said in an interview with CommonWealth Magazine, neither military exercises nor any other military action can obstruct the wind, water and sun.
Wu Hai-ruei is a manager of a listed company.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS