Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), in his capacity as Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman, was last week forced to intervene in an ongoing plagiarism scandal that threatened to engulf TPP Legislator Tsai Pi-ru (蔡壁如). Tsai’s master’s degree from Takming University of Science and Technology was on Thursday last week revoked after a review by its research ethics committee. Without admitting guilt, Tsai resigned on Friday, following guidance from Ko.
It is sometimes difficult to see where the real and widespread systemic flaws in Taiwan’s higher education end and the political parties’ baying for blood begins. It is good that the extent of the plagiarism issue has been unearthed, but as it is so widespread, the focus should be on addressing the underlying issues in higher education, rather than on the individual offenders.
However, that does not suit the objectives of the political parties seeking to attack their rivals in the run-up to next month’s local elections. Former Hsinchu mayor Lin Chih-chien (林智堅), who was the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) candidate in the Taoyuan mayoral race, was the first to fall. He did not concede guilt either, although the results of a National Taiwan University academic ethics review committee made his position untenable. It must have been difficult for Lin to withdraw his candidacy, not only because it has put a major obstacle in his political career, but it also casts a pall over his previous achievements after two terms as Hsinchu mayor.
Tsai has been a prominent member of the TPP, and for her to fall on her sword at this point would be equally damaging to her reputation. This, and that gaining a legislative seat is no small feat, even if only on the party’s legislator-at-large list, would have made the decision to quit difficult. Ko’s continued support of her through the controversy had already opened him to accusations of double standards, considering his negative appraisal of Lin’s integrity in his case.
In terms of election strategy, having a major name such as Lin fall so early in the race at least allowed the DPP to regroup and rally behind a replacement candidate. Despite the political damage to the party as a whole, it can at least draw a line, albeit a messily scrawled one, under the affair. The focus on Lin’s personal integrity has since dissipated and spread instead to the issue of plagiarism itself, and to the next to be accused.
The scandal has also reached TPP Legislator Ann Kao (高虹安), standing for Hsinchu mayor, the position vacated by Lin, and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taoyuan mayoral candidate Simon Chang (張善政), running for the job Lin was to campaign for. Chang would be a major scalp, having served as premier under former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and standing for vice president on the same KMT ticket as former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) in 2020. Kao and Chang remain in their respective races and therefore risk the controversy continuing to damage their reputations and chances.
How many more major scandals are being held in reserve by rival parties to claim scalps nearer the election?
The inescapable conclusion to this string of plagiarism controversies is that the problem runs deep, and is not exclusive to the political class, and certainly not, by some strange coincidence, to major political candidates that rivals are waiting for any chance to bring down. After the elections are over, perhaps the politicians can turn their attention to dealing with the core problem.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS