Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), in his capacity as Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman, was last week forced to intervene in an ongoing plagiarism scandal that threatened to engulf TPP Legislator Tsai Pi-ru (蔡壁如). Tsai’s master’s degree from Takming University of Science and Technology was on Thursday last week revoked after a review by its research ethics committee. Without admitting guilt, Tsai resigned on Friday, following guidance from Ko.
It is sometimes difficult to see where the real and widespread systemic flaws in Taiwan’s higher education end and the political parties’ baying for blood begins. It is good that the extent of the plagiarism issue has been unearthed, but as it is so widespread, the focus should be on addressing the underlying issues in higher education, rather than on the individual offenders.
However, that does not suit the objectives of the political parties seeking to attack their rivals in the run-up to next month’s local elections. Former Hsinchu mayor Lin Chih-chien (林智堅), who was the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) candidate in the Taoyuan mayoral race, was the first to fall. He did not concede guilt either, although the results of a National Taiwan University academic ethics review committee made his position untenable. It must have been difficult for Lin to withdraw his candidacy, not only because it has put a major obstacle in his political career, but it also casts a pall over his previous achievements after two terms as Hsinchu mayor.
Tsai has been a prominent member of the TPP, and for her to fall on her sword at this point would be equally damaging to her reputation. This, and that gaining a legislative seat is no small feat, even if only on the party’s legislator-at-large list, would have made the decision to quit difficult. Ko’s continued support of her through the controversy had already opened him to accusations of double standards, considering his negative appraisal of Lin’s integrity in his case.
In terms of election strategy, having a major name such as Lin fall so early in the race at least allowed the DPP to regroup and rally behind a replacement candidate. Despite the political damage to the party as a whole, it can at least draw a line, albeit a messily scrawled one, under the affair. The focus on Lin’s personal integrity has since dissipated and spread instead to the issue of plagiarism itself, and to the next to be accused.
The scandal has also reached TPP Legislator Ann Kao (高虹安), standing for Hsinchu mayor, the position vacated by Lin, and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taoyuan mayoral candidate Simon Chang (張善政), running for the job Lin was to campaign for. Chang would be a major scalp, having served as premier under former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and standing for vice president on the same KMT ticket as former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) in 2020. Kao and Chang remain in their respective races and therefore risk the controversy continuing to damage their reputations and chances.
How many more major scandals are being held in reserve by rival parties to claim scalps nearer the election?
The inescapable conclusion to this string of plagiarism controversies is that the problem runs deep, and is not exclusive to the political class, and certainly not, by some strange coincidence, to major political candidates that rivals are waiting for any chance to bring down. After the elections are over, perhaps the politicians can turn their attention to dealing with the core problem.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS