After Japan broke off diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1972, exchanges between the countries ended. It was only years later, through the efforts of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), that communication between Taipei and Tokyo was rekindled.
The next turning point came in the aftermath of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, when Taiwanese made significant contributions to disaster relief and recovery in Japan.
Then-Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe regarded Lee as a kind of mentor, and the mutual goodwill of the statesmen helped grow the bond between Taiwan and Japan.
Abe’s death has left a political vacuum in Japan, and pro-Taiwan groups especially have found themselves without a political leader. To make matters worse, last year, the pro-China Yoshimasa Hayashi became Japan’s minister of foreign affairs. Hayashi is quite open about his pro-China stance, and treats Taiwan brashly.
On the possibility of a “Taiwan emergency,” Hayashi spoke only of the need to evacuate Japanese citizens, and disregarded the security of Taiwan. When mentioning Vice President William Lai (賴清德), he avoided Lai’s name, referring to him simply as “that person.”
When it was confirmed that Japan would hold a state funeral for Abe, Hayashi instructed the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs to inform President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Lai that they were not invited. In the end, Taiwan sent a three-person delegation, which, after the funeral, was not asked to visit the Akasaka Palace.
These rebuffs not only filled Taiwanese with indignation, they also sowed uncertainty about the future of benevolent exchanges between the nations.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) once vowed that China would never seek regional hegemony, but Beijing’s bellicose behavior has shown otherwise, evidenced by a series of military exercises in the Taiwan Strait in August, launching missiles that landed in the waters of Japan’s exclusive economic zone.
On the 50th anniversary of Japan-China diplomatic relations, Xi exchanged congratulatory messages with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in a telephone call, saying that he attached “great importance” to the relations between their countries, even though, on the same day, Chinese naval ships sailed through the Osumi Strait, accompanied by Russian vessels.
Thus, the Janus-faced China conceals its iron fist in a velvet glove, and not every act of its wickedness is on the record.
Japan and China have a complicated history, with various grudges old and new, and their relations are expected to continue in this vein.
Nevertheless, the countries have much to offer each other. China’s market provides a solution to Japan’s economic woes, and China, besieged by the world because of its behavior, hopes to find a gateway in Japan. This is why Kishida at the UN General Assembly last month only condemned Russia, even though China and Russia are in collusion.
Similar dynamics are apparent in China’s attitude to Japan: At Abe’s state funeral, China did not complain about the presence of the Taiwanese delegation, and accepted that Beijing and Taipei were represented at an international event. It was a show of mutual goodwill between China and Japan, but under the surface the malevolence grows.
The Chinese Communist Party’s 20th National Congress is under way. Should Xi once again secure his position as the highest authority, he would be able to fulfill his political ambition by extending an olive branch to Japan.
Even though Xi is a driver of the hostile Japan-China relationship, the Kishida administration values the economy above defense, and would seize every profit-making opportunity.
A Japan-China relationship as such, top-down and lacking any popular will, is like an upside-down triangle, unstable and liable to topple at any moment.
The friendship between Taiwan and Japan is a bottom-up relationship founded upon popular goodwill. Similar to a pyramid with a solid base, the Taiwan-Japan relationship is built on virtues and good deeds. Even in a raging tempest, it would remain stable and stand tall.
The dynamic in exchanges between Taiwan, Japan and China are set, and any change would come as a result of their citizens.
In the free world, which includes Taiwan and Japan, everything depends on the popular will. The will of the people, like sea currents, is capable of carrying and overturning a boat. The autocrat, without heeding public opinion, would reap what they sow and suffer the consequence of their own doing.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
RSS