The Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) announced that Taiwan’s armed forces are to concentrate on the production of corvettes, which undoubtedly sends a clear positive message to those who advocate for the “micro-class missile assault boats.”
Taiwan proper is an island. Based on previous wars, as well as the objectives and probable attack scenarios of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the key to defending Taiwan is to protect its airfields and ports, and keep the commercial traffic channels safe and open, as much as is possible.
As long as ports can function and the US is able to send military aid, the situation, politically speaking, would become a confrontation between China and the US. The US having Taiwan’s back would deter Beijing most effectively.
To secure ports, it is imperative to keep the PLA’s undersea forces at a distance. Therefore, advanced anti-submarine ships are a must. Meanwhile, China would threaten Taiwan with its air force, using it to attack surface targets. Taiwan must therefore maintain a certain number of advanced aircraft to maintain local air superiority.
Taiwan also needs to enhance its ground facilities to protect them, and ensure the quality and sustainability of its armed forces. That way, Taiwan can extend the length of time it is able to rely on its own defense while receiving US military aid.
As it would be difficult to develop indigenous advanced fighter jets, the nation must maintain its anti-submarine warfare capabilities. Should there be a war, Taiwan can ensure sea channels are not blocked. In peacetime, it can execute reconnaissance and surveillance in the Taiwan Strait. Therefore, the corvettes Chiu mentioned are extremely important.
As a platform and vehicle, corvettes are indispensable for Taiwan. Although the military has relatively little experience manufacturing the surface combatants, it is necessary to start the process. A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step, as they say.
The government should initiate the research and development of surface ships. With a prototype, Taiwanese developers can use their technology and experience to refine them.
The process might be long, but this is the path that every strong country must take when consolidating its national defense.
Chiu also commented on possible collaborations between the Ministry of National Defense and civilian defense forces, a concept that the media has reported on in the past few weeks.
Commenting that he did not know much about the Kuma Academy, which has received backing from United Microelectronics Corp founder Robert Tsao (曹興誠), Chiu said that he was not sure how the military could collaborate with the group or how to position the civilians it trains.
This was an appropriate response. Chiu properly accounted for public opinion and national security.
Of course, Taiwan should encourage Taiwanese to care about and support national defense. Society should also praise those who are willing to participate in the armed forces.
However, with limited resources, it would be difficult to conduct the required loyalty checks and ensure advisory controls for all participants.
The ministry controls the resources for practical training at a critical time with great responsibility. Regarding the civilians’ proposal, it is only correct that the ministry be discreet in its response.
Chang Kuo-cheng is an international relations professor at Taipei Medical University.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS