Mon, Oct 03, 2022 page9

• The biggest threat to democracy and peace is thuggishness

  For democracy and peace to have a chance, civil people must start standing up for their values

  • By Andreas Kluth / Bloomberg Opinion
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Democracy is in a worldwide slump. So is peace — both the international and the domestic sort. There are lots of reasons. What is the biggest?

  Many pundits blame various kinds of polarization: left against right, elitist versus populist, blue against red, educated or rich against uneducated or poor, nativist versus cosmopolitan, Sino-Russian autocratic against “Western” democratic, and so forth.

  The dichotomy that matters more than any of these is civil versus thuggish. Our problem — in the US, Europe, Russia, Brazil, China, the UN — is that the thugs have been winning almost everywhere.

  “Thug” comes from Hindi and originally referred to violent gangs of robbers. Nowadays we use the word for hooligans, bullies, or other brutes. Among rappers, the term has taken on an ironic twist, but we can leave that usage to them.

  In essence, “thuggishness” is intimidation with the threat of violence. It spreads wherever civility breaks down. In places such as Germany or Italy after World War I, thugs took to the streets, beating up or shouting down anybody they did not like. They called themselves “Blackshirts,” “Brownshirts,” “Free Corps” and “Red Fronts.” Contemporary analogs include “Oath Keepers,” “Proud Boys,” “Night Wolves” — a Russian motorcycle club — and other packs.

  However, whether they adulate Benito Mussolini, Vladimir Lenin, former US president Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin or any other leader, politics is arguably only a veneer. The underlying phenomenon is thuggishness.

  Thugs do not have to be physically pugnacious to vandalize the public square. It suffices for the violence to be implied, verbal or even subliminal. That is because aggression in any form ruins the things that make civilized society possible: civics and conversation.

  The words “civil” and “polite” both come from Latin and Greek roots that also gave us such words as “city” and “politics.” To “converse” originally meant “to turn toward” one another, with the motivation to connect — and ideally to inch closer to the truth of something, perhaps even to find solutions to common problems. Nuance, contradiction, subtlety, ambivalence and humor are features of such congregating, not bugs.

  However, when thugs show up for colloquy, they are not there to converse, connect, learn, understand or listen. They are in it to dominate. Winning is all, truth is irrelevant. This is bad faith, the malware that corrupts civics.

  The result is fake “debates” and “conversations.” They typically descend into belligerent “whataboutism.”

  “I lied? Well, what about all those lies your people told?” The merit of any argument becomes irrelevant. The only thing that counts is the ammunition the thugs can fire ad hominem at the person across from them, and the artillery cover they get from their mob.

  “Whataboutism” and other forms of verbal thuggishness are hardly a recent invention. They were already a major theme in the Socratic dialogues — at that time the so-called Sophists were the rhetorical thugs — and then in the trial that ended in a jury of 500 Athenians condemning Socrates to death.

  But modern media have made the pathogen more virulent. In the US, Fox News and its clones on talk radio and television in effect honed and perfected verbal thuggishness over decades. Social media picked up the baton. Twitter threads routinely deteriorate into digital shouting matches and name-calling. If last century’s Brownshirts or Blackshirts bludgeoned people, modern trolls “cancel” or “doxx” their victims.

  Verbal thuggishness is problematic for two reasons. The first is that atmospherics matter. When thugs or their leaders prime a mob long enough with truculent rhetoric, the violence can easily turn physical. The result is outrages such as the attack on the US Capitol on Jan. 6 last year.

  The second reason is that verbal thuggishness is a form of “epistemic vice.” Rather as bad money drives out good, it displaces “epistemic virtue,” a term academics use to refer to intellectual humility — the ability to recognize our cognitive limits, to admit when we are wrong, to change or adjust our opinions and keep our minds open.

  What happens when thugs take over — as in Weimar Germany — is that civil people get scared and retreat into their private spheres, leaving the public square to the ruffians. The public and epistemic virtues that the US’ founding fathers cared so deeply about wane, while the vices wax. Symptoms include the spread of conspiracy theories and a cynical disdain for truth. The only value left is power.

  If thuggishness is a virus that compromises the operating systems of open societies, is there an anti-malware patch? Not really. Our only defenses are our holdouts of civility.

  People who are reasonable and intellectually humble — “virtuous” — may still be in the numerical majority. But they are too often inaudible. For democracy and peace to have a chance, they must start voting with their behavior — swaying television ratings, and rejecting lies and manipulations. The thugs must start losing. History suggests these struggles could go either way.

  Andreas Kluth is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering European politics. A former editor in chief of Handelsblatt Global and a writer for The Economist, he is author of Hannibal and Me.

  This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Palmeiras hopes for club cup win

  • 2

    Magnitude 6.4 earthquake hits Hualien County

  • 3

    Taiwan to see nine extended holidays in 2026

  • 4

    Hegseth outlines Chinese threat

  • 5

    Pegatron ranks last in Greenpeace report