US President Joe Biden on Wednesday told the UN General Assembly that the US seeks to “uphold peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait” and remains committed to the “one China” policy, three days after he said the US would commit troops to Taiwan’s defense if there was “an unprecedented attack.”
After Biden on Sunday said during an interview that the US would send troops to defend Taiwan if China attempted an invasion, the White House said its Taiwan policy had not changed, leading to speculation that the White House was walking back the president’s comments.
It might also seem that Biden’s speech at the UN contradicted his comments on Taiwan during the interview, but the White House and Biden have been consistent on US policy.
Washington’s position has always been to oppose any unilateral change to the Taiwan-China relationship. Boosting sales of defensive weapons to Taiwan — which is the core purpose of the proposed US Taiwan policy act — and committing US troops to defend Taiwan are not in conflict with upholding the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait. As an invasion attempt would be a unilateral change to the Taiwan-China relationship, the US would be justified in defending Taiwan.
That is not to say there has been no change to the US’ approach to its relations with Taiwan and China. The US is clearly focusing more attention on Taiwan, which is reflected in recent legislation and public comments by Biden and US senators.
However, Washington also hopes it can deter unilateral action by China, which is the purpose of its warship transits in the Taiwan Strait and the increased arms sales to Taiwan.
Washington had sought to deter Beijing by maintaining “strategic ambiguity” on Taiwan, but the increase in Chinese military aggression over the past year has shown that ambiguity is not helping it achieve that aim.
Researcher Chieh Chung (揭仲) from the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) National Policy Foundation think tank said he believed the US “would definitely in some way intervene” if China attempted an invasion, because staying on the sidelines would undermine the US’ Indo-Pacific strategy.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Lo Chih-cheng (羅致政), a member of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, said: “It is hard to imagine that the US would just sit back” if a conflict were to break out in the Strait, but “Washington immediately sending troops to help Taiwan is also unlikely.”
It remains unclear what the US would do in the event of a conflict in the Taiwan Strait, but it seems increasingly clear that it would get involved and — if Biden is to be believed — that involvement would mean sending troops. Given that Biden has publicly reiterated this claim multiple times, it is unlikely he made the comments in error, or that he was confused about Washington’s policy.
Biden would also have been informed of the interview questions ahead of time, so his responses would have been thought through. It might be that he is privy to strategic plans that he cannot speak about publicly, or that Washington hopes to play both sides of the coin to keep Beijing confused — letting Biden speak about troop commitments, while denying such plans afterward. Either way, it is highly likely that the US military has plans to respond to a Chinese invasion of Taiwan.
Taipei must continue to improve the nation’s defense capabilities and cooperate with US officials as much as possible. It should also continue to express to China its rejection of unification, and its resolve to defend the nation’s sovereignty and democracy.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS