The US’ Taiwan policy act (TPA) cleared a US Senate committee review on Wednesday last week. US Senator Bob Menendez, who chairs the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, described the TPA as “the most comprehensive restructuring of US policy towards Taiwan since the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979.”
In mid-July, a scheduled markup of the act was postponed at the request of the Republican Party to allow more time for review. Last month, the White House requested that the committee “slow walk” the review process.
US Senator Chris Murphy of the Democratic Party expressed reservations over several sections of the act, probably under pressure from the White House. The bill was postponed again as the US Senate prioritized a motion to allow Finland and Sweden to join NATO.
The White House is clearly uneasy about the bill. US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan expressed reservations over several sections of the TPA, while Menendez said that the committee had already engaged in repeated dialogue with the White House and reached a consensus.
Following further discussions with the White House, Menendez stated that efforts were made to eliminate concerns, but that the TPA still packed a punch. Predictably, after the bill had passed committee review, Menendez stated that several symbolic clauses had been amended, but that the TPA remained unchanged in substance.
The postponement of the TPA for a second time last month coincided with the visit to Taiwan by US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Days prior to Pelosi’s visit, US President Joe Biden held a telephone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), during which Xi allegedly requested that Biden block Pelosi’s visit.
A report by the Washington Post revealed that Pelosi had told the White House that only a direct request from the president, or Taiwan retracting its invitation, would make her consider canceling the visit.
Biden did not make a direct request to Pelosi. It must have been embarrassing for Biden to have had it publicly revealed that his administration had put pressure on Pelosi in an effort to curry favor with Xi, and to know that it could affect the Democratic Party’s prospects at the midterm elections in November.
This behind the scenes information reveals that there might be something to the rumor that Pelosi sent a telegram to Taiwanese Representative to the US Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) to confirm that the invitation had not been revoked. Taipei stood with Pelosi, refused to back down and her historic visit went ahead. This initially sparked fears that the White House might slow the TPA’s passage to calm the situation.
However, China’s extreme reaction to Pelosi’s visit fired up the international community and created an unprecedented level of support for Taiwan.
China has escalated its attacks against the TPA, turning it into a touchstone issue. Supporting or opposing the TPA has thus become a proxy for US toughness or weakness against China. Xi’s intervention therefore had an indirect effect on the act’s passage of its first reading by the committee. Committee members voted 17 to 5 in favor of the TPA in a bipartisan vote. Murphy and US Senator Ed Markey, who was a member of Pelosi’s delegation to Taiwan, voted against the TPA, which could open the door to further negotiations with the executive branch.
There is still a long way to go before the TPA is written into law, and its passage happens to coincide with midterm elections in the US, local elections in Taiwan and the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th National Congress. The bill’s future is far from certain.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Edward Jones
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS