When I saw the open letter in the China Daily with more than 900 civil organizations listed as signatories, I laughed out loud, wondering who would believe this statement. China is again trying to fool the world. I had not expected this to put so much pressure on the most prestigious person in the world’s most prestigious organization, the outgoing UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet.
A week earlier, Bachelet had hinted that she might not keep her promise to publish a Xinjiang report, saying that in the previous months, her “office had received letters from about 40 countries, including China, asking for non-publication of the report.”
“I have been under tremendous pressure to publish, or not to publish,” she added.
However, Bachelet decided to publish the report 10 minutes before her term ended. Fortunately, in a serious international matter, China’s simple game in the UN has failed to reach its goal.
Political history and China’s own legal documents have shown that civil organizations cannot exist in a one-party government system. “Civil” organizations in such a regime are realistically a piece of the government or a puppet organization. This is common knowledge among educated people, so how could Bachelet claim not to understand this?
I spent a few days searching for information about the organizations listed in the open letter, and 90 percent of them do not exist on either Google or Baidu. Let us consider the list logically.
Who are these 900-plus so-called “civil organizations”?
There are numerous organizations on the list that include the name “Xinjiang.” The reality is that regulations dictate that no more than 15 Uighurs can gather for a wedding or funeral. Uighur residents need police approval to accept visitors into their homes. Therefore, how can such “civil organizations” exist?
According to Radio Free Asia, Uighurs are not allowed to see uncensored international news, and many are punished for crossing the “Great Firewall” of China. How would they know about the sensitive news about a Xinjiang report?
If there are some organizations with Han Chinese settlers who could speak to the world, they are not civilians, but auxiliary alliances of Chinese officials and armed forces who are committing genocide. They are the main group that is benefiting from government systems and the genocide against the Uighurs, so their opinions cannot be considered.
With that said, I do not believe that these organizations exist.
Some of the named civil organizations are associated with the Inner China provinces.
Recently, Holly Snape, a British postdoctoral fellow at the University of Glasgow specializing in China, published a report titled “Re-writing the Rules,” which said that Chinese officials assessing civil servants’ “political quality” can influence the rules they make for non-governmental organizations (NGOs).
The report also said that China has enhanced laws and policies a step forward and does not allow for an independent civil society. The organizations must submit to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “total” leadership over their operations.
Thus, we can say that all the organizations on the list, if they truly exist, are branches of government agencies and are irrelevant to civilians.
I also noticed that of the foreign friendship organizations from 40 countries on the list, most have no formal regulations and systems, and they are based on specific financial interests. Some of them, including the US-China People’s Friendship Association, were under the wing of the Chinese People’s Association for Friendship. That association has been described as the “public face” of the CCP’s United Front Work Department, and its leadership is drawn from the upper ranks of the CCP.
Its current chairperson is Lin Songtian (林松添), China’s former ambassador to South Africa, who had suggested that the US Army was responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic in China.
Another China expert, Kalpit Makikar of the Observer Research Foundation in India, wrote in a report titled “CCP’s use of overseas Chinese to influence western democracies”: “Overseas Chinese have always had a unique relationship with China’s rulers since its imperial past. Since the Communist takeover in 1949, the party-state has sought to co-opt ethnic Chinese settled abroad through the United Front Work Department.”
“Now, [Chinese President] Xi Jinping (習近平) is weaponizing overseas Chinese on an industrial scale, and its reverberations are being felt in Western democracies,” the report said.
The most important matter of note is that no single organization among the more than 900 listed is well known internationally. They have never solved any problems and have never spoken out against any government, yet they suddenly voice concern when the Uighur genocide is being publicized, which should raise questions about their origins and nature.
Therefore, the letter, whether it contains real or fake signatures, was prepared by the united front department, whose goal is to “make the foreign serve China.”
The letters from “40 countries” were political theater orchestrated by the CCP.
Finally, Ms Bachelet realized or acknowledged the theater and released the report. In this one occasion the truth prevailed over political theater, and the oppressed, instead of the oppressor, are to be heard.
Kok Bayraq is a Uighur American.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) took the stage at a protest rally on Sunday in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei in support of former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been sentenced to 17 years in jail for corruption and embezzlement. Huang told the crowd that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) had sent a message of support the previous day, saying she would be traveling from the south to Taipei: If the protest continued into the evening, she had said, she would show up. The rally was due to end
RSS