Europe has been experiencing a heat wave, with temperatures exceeding 40oC in parts of the UK, France and Spain, leading to fires, traffic accidents and deaths from hyperthermia or related conditions. The record-breaking heat wave shows how the challenge of climate change is growing more severe with each passing year.
The EU’s European Climate Law stipulates that Europe’s economy and society must become climate-neutral by 2050, and the war between Russia and Ukraine has exposed the bloc’s urgent need to reduce its energy dependence on Russia.
Under the dual pressures of net-zero carbon emission targets on the one hand and energy supply and demand on the other, the European Parliament changed direction earlier this month, narrowly approving the EU Taxonomy Complementary Climate Delegated Act, which, under strict conditions, allows specific gas and nuclear energy activities to be listed as “sustainable.”
This law stipulates very stringent conditions for recognizing natural gas and nuclear energy activities as “sustainable.” They include the need to obtain a construction permit by 2045, to propose long-term disposal facilities for high-level nuclear waste by 2050 and to have guaranteed funding in place. These conditions are economically, technologically and environmentally hard to meet, and only a few EU member states are capable of doing meeting them.
Nonetheless, several EU member states have strongly criticized the law. They say that it “greenwashes” nuclear power, and that it is illegal and invalid.
Germany, Luxembourg and Austria are among those who strongly oppose this new “greenwashing” law. Each country has its own situation.
In Austria’s case, its government finished building the Zwentendorf Nuclear Power Plant in 1977, but it met with fierce opposition from civic groups and individuals. Following a 1978 referendum in which a small majority of voters voted against commissioning the plant, it never went into operation. The 1986 Chernobyl nuclear accident reinforced anti-nuclear attitudes in Austria, and in 1999, the Austrian Parliament enacted the Federal Constitutional Act for a Non-Nuclear Austria.
As well as familiar issues such as nuclear waste and safety, Austria’s strong anti-nuclear stance might also be a legacy of the Cold War. The dark clouds of the Chernobyl accident floated over Europe for a long time, spreading nuclear radioactive substances across the continent. Despite being neighbors of the then-Soviet Union, European countries could not do anything about the changes happening within the Iron Curtain or stop the nuclear pollution from floating through the sky. Last year, environmental groups in Austria still detected traces of radioactive contamination from Chernobyl in Austrian mushrooms. This painful experience has made Austria determined to say no to nuclear energy.
Taiwan, with its small size and dense population, could hardly meet the new EU law’s standards on nuclear waste disposal. So far this summer, Taiwan’s electricity consumption has exceeded a record high of 40 gigawatts, but solar power’s contribution of more than 4.61 gigawatts at peak hours has ensured an unbroken supply of electricity. This is a remarkable achievement on the path of energy transition.
As for the new law that the European Parliament barely passed even under intense internal and external pressures, Taiwan can take it as a point of reference, but no more than that.
Chen Ping-hei is a distinguished professor at National Taiwan University’s Department of Mechanical Engineering. Chiang Ya-chi is an associate professor of intellectual property law at National Taipei University of Technology.
Translated by Julian Clegg
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS