European natural gas prices are still well below the all-time high set in March, but dig a bit deeper and they are signaling a more protracted disruption than markets anticipated in the immediate aftermath of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.
While the gas market then priced in a short-lived crisis, lasting perhaps a couple of months, it is now flashing extreme danger for next winter, through next year and, increasingly, into 2024. At the beginning of this month, the whole European gas price curve repriced at a much higher level.
The shift in the forward curve was the most notable development of the gas market in the past month — one that is not gathering enough attention in European capitals.
However, the industry is keenly aware, as it is bearing the cost.
In March, a German manufacturer could lock in gas prices for all of next year at about 80 euros (US$80.70) per megawatt hour; now, it has to pay a record high 145 euros to hedge the same price risk.
In the first week of this month, the closely watched Dutch Title Transfer Facility (TTF) contract, a European spot benchmark, rose to about 175 euros, doubling in a month after Russia cut supplies via the Nord Stream 1 pipeline into Germany.
Even so, spot gas prices remain below the record settlement of 227 euros set during the early days of the war — worrying, but not alarming; prices are high, but not that high. After what the market weathered in March, it can be understood why policymakers are not panicking.
However, that is if you ignore the action on the back end of the curve. On March 5 — when spot gas prices surged to about 185 euros — the contract for delivery in December rose only to about 155 euros; in the first week of this month, when the spot price was slightly lower, the December contract traded at nearly 195 euros.
A year into Russia manipulating European gas supplies, the market is finally convinced that Moscow will continue to do so, and perhaps with greater intensity. The first test comes soon. The Nord Stream 1 pipeline, the most important gas link between Russia and the EU, is undergoing annual maintenance until Thursday. Berlin fears that Moscow could find an excuse to keep it closed for good, cutting gas supplies to Germany completely. After all that Moscow has done, the German government is right to be concerned.
Yet, Russia might want to keep some gas flowing to preserve its long-term leverage. From a game-theory point of view, that makes sense. Once Russia stops shipments completely, it can no longer apply pressure. Tactically, Moscow is likely to keep some gas moving, retaining the option of cutting or slowing flows whenever it chooses.
Moreover, Nord Stream 1 is the main route for Russian gas into Europe indexed against the TTF contract, Goldman Sachs has said.
Not reopening the pipeline after the maintenance shutdown would limit the profit that Gazprom, the Russian state-owned gas giant, enjoys from sky-high gas prices.
Russia has clearly written off its gas relationship with Europe, but for now, the Kremlin is likely to continue to enjoy the best of both worlds: high revenue and compelling leverage. To achieve its objectives, Russia needs to continue selling some gas to Germany, but at reduced rates, as it is doing at present.
The market is right to reprice the gas curve; the only question is why it took so long. There is further risk ahead: At some point, Moscow is likely to completely turn off the tap, probably just before the winter, to try to bring the German economy to its knees. That is an outcome the market has not priced yet.
Javier Blas is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy and commodities, and a former reporter for Bloomberg News and commodities editor at the Financial Times.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of
the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS