Vice President William Lai (賴清德) on Monday traveled to Tokyo to offer his condolences after the assassination of former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe. Although Lai’s visit was regarded as a part of his “personal itinerary,” it marks a significant diplomatic breakthrough for Taipei, and it conjures memories of past interactions between Taiwanese and Japanese leaders.
An agricultural economics professor at Meiji Gakuin University — whom I have known for many years — was a classmate of late former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) at Cornell University. They kept in touch after graduation, with the professor once visiting Lee in Taiwan.
When Lee was preparing to visit Cornell after his presidential term ended, the professor was also back at the school conducting research. Upon hearing about Lee’s then-unconfirmed visit, I contacted the professor.
Soon afterward, a compatriot group in New York rented four buses to travel to Ithaca to welcome Lee. I relayed the news to the professor, who replied that since there were four buses coming, the rumors about Lee’s visit were likely true.
He called his wife in Japan and asked her to book a ticket to the US, since she and Lee’s wife, Tseng Wen-hui (曾文惠), had spent a lot of time together at Ithaca, where they would sometimes shop for groceries together. Although he and Lee had met a few times since graduating, their wives had not seen each other for more than two decades.
While reporting on Lee’s visit to Cornell, one news outlet said that the professor had relayed a greeting to Lee on behalf of Japan’s imperial family. I wrote to the professor to confirm the report. While he neither admitted nor denied his connections with the imperial family, he said that if he and Lee were to meet again, it would have to be in either Taiwan or Japan, in order not to inconvenience a third-party country.
By using the classmate’s relationship as a means to represent the imperial family, their greeting through the professor not only showcased Lee’s profound connection with Japan, but also Tokyo’s meticulous and prudent attitude when addressing such issues.
In December 2015, then-Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) arrived in Tokyo on a visit to meet with friends. As Abe “happened” to be having a lunch meeting in the same hotel Tsai was staying in, the media were speculating whether Abe would meet with her.
Afterward, when a diplomat working in the US embassy in Tokyo attended a conference at his alma mater Columbia University, I asked him about the rumor during the question-and-answer session.
Before responding, the diplomat said that his statements in the conference do not represent those of the US Department of State, but added he could easily verify that Abe and Tsai had met “by chance.”
Similar to Lai’s visit to Abe’s funeral, these events were arranged with the greatest care and discretion by the Japanese government.
Abe once famously remarked that “a Taiwan emergency is a Japanese emergency.” The Japanese leaders who inherit Abe’s political legacy would have to tackle difficult issues and must continue to strengthen Taiwan-Japan relations.
Further challenges await the two nations for the next diplomatic breakthrough.
Peter Chow is a professor of economics at City University of New York, and was a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research and a consultant for the World Bank.
Translated by Rita Wang
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
Taiwan is to hold a referendum on Saturday next week to decide whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, which was shut down in May after 40 years of service, should restart operations for as long as another 20 years. The referendum was proposed by the opposition Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and passed in the legislature with support from the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Its question reads: “Do you agree that the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should continue operations upon approval by the competent authority and confirmation that there are no safety concerns?” Supporters of the proposal argue that nuclear power
RSS