The launch of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) on the sidelines of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) summit in Tokyo on May 23 received huge global attention, primarily because the IPEF has crystallized the Quad-plus formula to develop a strong regional economic grouping to challenge China’s dominance in the region.
Of course, one country that keenly observed this development was Taiwan. In fact, with Taiwan’s strong economic base and its security challenges emanating from China among other factors, sections of academics in Taiwan, the US and elsewhere expected Taipei to be included in the IPEF. Therefore, its exclusion disappointed a majority of them.
However, it needs to be understood and stressed that the absence of Taiwan from the IPEF also runs a high risk of the failure of this initiative for various reasons.
First, one of the major pillars of IPEF is to build trade and technology policies to promote economic activity and investment, promote sustainable and inclusive economic growth and benefit workers and consumers. Certainly, Taiwan, which adheres to the rules and regulations of the WTO and enjoys a strong bilateral economic relationship with the US and other countries, naturally has a major role to play in promoting rules-based free and fair trade in the region.
At the same time, Taiwan’s expertise in advanced technology is globally recognized. This can be gauged from the fact that nearly 80 percent of global network security hardware equipment is produced in Taiwan. With the digitization of the world economy, Taiwan can offer its expertise in making it more secure and reliable. After all, Taiwan faces cyberattacks from China on a regular basis. More to the point, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy completely reciprocates the IPEF.
Second, improving transparency, diversity, security and sustainability in regional and global supply chains is another pillar of the IPEF. Therefore, while the US-China trade dispute, the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have severely impacted supply chains, Taiwan has emerged as a major player in sustaining global supply chains.
Taiwan provided medical equipment to other countries when the world medical system had virtually collapsed, and has been a major source of semiconductors, producing 90 percent of global output of the most advanced semiconductors. In turn, the issue of the production of semiconductor has placed Taiwan at the center of global attention. It only proves the necessity for Taiwan’s inclusion as an integral part of maintaining global supply chains in the IPEF.
Third, the IPEF also intends to contribute toward the development and deployment of clean energy technologies to decarbonize our economies and build resilience to climate impacts. Although several countries are still debating how to deal with these issues, Taiwan has already expressed its commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 and has taken several initiatives, including the National Climate Change Adaptation Action Plan. Given Taiwan’s geography and climate, its participation in IPEF would enable Taipei to share technology, ideas and experience to the countries of the Indo-Pacific region in reducing carbon emissions.
The fourth pillar of the IPEF is to promote fair competition by enacting and enforcing effective and robust tax, anti-money laundering and anti-bribery regimes in line with existing multilateral obligations, and standards and agreements to curb tax evasion and corruption in the Indo-Pacific region.
This objective assumes huge importance at a time when China has been subverting all the rules and regulations of international trade to its own benefit. On the other hand, Taiwan has a robust system of fair competition, having built the trust and confidence of foreign traders in the country. More to the point, the Fair Trade Act (公平交易法) provides basic rules for all kinds of competitive behaviors of enterprises. Moreover, Taiwan’s record on democratic principles, and social and institutional values has been exceptionally good. Hence, it is beyond comprehension how the IPEF can succeed in its endeavors without the support of Taiwan.
Of course, while this analysis makes a strong case for Taiwan’s inclusion, it should also be realized that the IPEF can play a pivotal role in nurturing Taiwan’s independent identity. For example, Taiwan’s participation in regional and global groupings would help Taipei to reduce its dependence on China in the economic sphere.
When countries such as the US, Japan and others have strongly opined in favor of Taiwan’s existence as an independent nation, talks need to be backed by actions. At the same time, half-hearted approaches to address the Taiwan issue would only embolden China to increase its assertive posturing. Though at the bilateral level, US President Joe Biden’s administration has launched a new trade pact with Taiwan, the US should also recognize that Washington needs to go beyond its individual efforts to strengthen Taiwan’s national identity. In doing so, US-led groups including the Quad, the IPEF and others have hardly any choice but to take concrete steps to engage Taiwan.
As the IPEF is still at the nascent stage, it should be expected that wisdom would soon prevail over the Quad’s members — the US, Japan, Australia and India — to include Taiwan in the new regional economic grouping of the Indo-Pacific region.
Sumit Kumar is a former Ministry of Foreign Affairs visiting fellow at National Chengchi University and a postdoctoral fellow at the Indian Council of Social Sciences.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS