Now that Ukraine has evacuated its fighters from Mariupol, ceding control of the city to Russian forces, the consequences can be sorted. One has so far gone largely unexplored — the effect on the production of noble gases.
Azovstal, the besieged steel plant in Mariupol, is one of only a handful of facilities in the world capable of producing the materials needed to cost-effectively make noble gases such as neon, krypton, xenon and helium, which are critical for global manufacturing. What is needed now is a better understanding of how supply has been hit so that alternative sources can be quickly developed.
Neon, for example, is a key input for the semiconductor manufacturing process. The gas is a byproduct of steel production and is only commercially viable when it is produced in significant quantities from large steel plants such as Azovstal.
Producers such as Ingas, which is linked to Mariupol, and Cryoin in Odesa pull the neon from the air and make it available for use.
However, with production at both companies now indefinitely suspended, analysts worry about the supply of neon and other gases, especially to Western manufacturers.
A big problem is that the noble gas market remains dependent on a handful of specialists — firms such as Linde PLC, Air Liquide SA and Air Products and Chemicals Inc — which prefer to engage in confidential long-term contracts. The lack of transparency has impeded the development of a spot market — where uncontracted supplies can be sold at current market prices — and discouraged natural price discovery.
As nobody can be sure of current pricing, it is difficult to assess just how much noble gas supply there is. What is known is that, until 2014, when Russia invaded, as much as 90 percent of global neon supply was sourced from Ukraine. The bulk of this came from Mariupol and most of it went to Western markets.
Cliff Cain of the Edelgas Group, an independent consultancy, said that some production has since shifted to China, with Ukraine now probably representing between 50 and 70 percent of global neon production. South Korea’s POSCO steelmaking company, too, has begun producing a small amount to cater to domestic demand.
On a recent earnings call, Linde chief executive officer Sanjiv Lamba said that his company gets less than 20 percent of its neon supply from Ukrainian and Russian sources, and that it remains well diversified.
Linde and Air Products did not respond to e-mails asking for comment.
A spokeswoman for Air Liquide said that the company has no current exposure to Ukrainian or Russian neon markets.
However, if Russia retains control of Mariupol and restarts the city’s damaged plants, 95 percent of the market could wind up in the hands of just two potentially “unfriendly” players, Cain said.
Metinvest Group, the mining company of Ukrainian billionaire Rinat Akhmetov, which owns Azovstal as well as the nearby Ilyich steel plant, has said his company is in the process of preparing US$10 billion of lawsuits against Russia for the destruction of the two Mariupol facilities.
However, that sum would barely touch the second-order effects if semiconductor manufacturing becomes constrained because of neon shortages.
Uncertainty around helium supply — another noble gas needed for semiconductor manufacturing — is also building.
Helium is either sourced from natural deposits in the ground or can be extracted as a byproduct of the gas liquefaction process in the right circumstances. Although production is more diversified, with the US, Qatar and Algeria counting as some of the biggest producers, the helium market nevertheless suffers from significant pricing opacity.
The same specialist companies also dominate. Would-be competitors and buyers claim that, in many cases, they make agreements on loss-leading terms to capture broader gas supply business, preventing price discovery.
What little uncontracted supply exists is being quoted at five times the usual rate, Cain said — a figure confirmed by Stefano Marani, the CEO of South Africa-based Renergen, an independent helium and natural gas producer.
As the noble gas market’s troubles predate the war in Ukraine, it is hard not to blame market structure for current circumstances, but sometimes a squeeze is just what is needed to encourage transparency.
It was market tightness following the 1979 Iranian revolution that finally skewered the grip of the Seven Sisters cartel — the group of Western oil producers that dominated long-term contracting in the market — and allowed an active oil spot market to emerge.
More recently, the liquefied natural gas (LNG) market opened in the wake of market tightness caused by the 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear disaster in Japan and the post-Arab Spring decline in Egyptian gas production. The market has moved gracefully from a “take or pay” type system indexed to oil prices to one in which spot cargoes now dominate, encouraging better price visibility and understanding of supply-side dynamics.
The noble gas market would be wise to follow suit.
A good first step would be for Western governments to call for more transparency from the big companies about how much supply has been hurt by the war and how much is still being sourced from either disputed territories or those that pose a risk of being sanctioned.
Market participants should also support the development of new platforms that allow them to post bids to woo supply and cover shortages, or urge existing exchanges to support noble gas quotes.
The cryptomarket, for one, is already looking at opportunities in this space. It has convinced Renergen, which is bringing new supply to market from this year onward, to sell its volumes in tokenized form.
Whatever the path to a spot market, it is becoming increasingly clear that gases such as neon and helium are too important to be under the thumb of only a few big players. Noble gases should be allowed to float freely on the market.
Izabella Kaminska is founder and editor of the Blind Spot. She spent 13 years at the Financial Times, most recently as the editor of FT Alphaville. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS