New US Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns took office on March 28. Based on his schedule from the past month or so, it appears that breaking the US and China from their deadlock will not be easy.
When the US-China trade dispute started in March 2018, then-US ambassador to China Terry Branstad’s personal friendship with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) was not enough to improve the situation. He left office in October 2020.
Then, for the first time in more than 40 years since the establishment of diplomatic relations between the countries, the role was left vacant for more than 18 months until US President Joe Biden nominated Burns, a career diplomat.
Burns’ nomination was approved by the US Senate in December last year, but his inauguration was delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Even before he arrived in Beijing, he proposed an “authorized exit” of US diplomats to Washington for the sake of disease prevention, triggering a diplomatic storm. Burns’ proposal was interpreted as an indirect boycott against the Beijing Winter Olympics, and was perceived as a slap in the face of the Chinese authorities. His term began with a rough start.
In the past decade or so, most of the US ambassadors to China were political heavyweights with great influence, such as Chinese-American Gary Locke, who is also a former US secretary of commerce and governor of Washington State.
Branstad had served as governor of the major agricultural state of Iowa for 16 years. He received Xi in the state as early as 1985, when the latter — who was then the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) secretary of Hebei Province’s Zhengding County — led a Chinese delegation to visit the US for the first time.
After Branstad’s 2016 nomination, then-Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Lu Kang (陸慷) called him “an old friend of the Chinese people.”
Originally, then-US president Donald Trump’s nomination was seen as a gesture of goodwill, but the two nations still ended up in discord.
Washington’s appointment of a career diplomat as the US ambassador to China might not be a coincidence given the current structural contradictions between the countries.
Despite cold interactions with Chinese officials, Burns has been active in Beijing’s diplomatic circles. In the past month or so, he has met with ambassadors or representatives of Australia, Canada, the EU, India, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore, all of which are key US allies of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue or Five Eyes alliance, while faithfully implementing the Biden administration’s Indo-Pacific strategy.
Burns was in charge of Russian affairs when serving on the White House’s National Security Council 30 years ago, and among his tasks as ambassador is to support Ukraine.
After taking office, he met with the Polish ambassador, and received the Nordic and Baltic ambassadorial group led by the Swedish ambassador. He was photographed with Ukraine’s temporary acting representative in front of the US embassy with the Ukrainian flag. He does this while trying to keep up with Washington’s pace in Beijing.
Some Chinese online ridicule Burns for neglecting his duties, questioning whether the ambassador left his heart overseas while living in China, and whether he has come to Beijing to socialize with foreign representatives of other countries.
In terms of a diplomat’s primary and secondary duties, there might not be a clear and consistent definition. Still, how is Burns going to handle relationships with Chinese officials and society? His moves in the past few months have given some clues.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, was “amazed” and “enthralled” by Chinese who rise at 3am for work. He praised it as a manifestation of talent and a good work ethic. Truthfully, that praise and statement about China, no matter its motivation, is nothing more than a round of applause for the atrocities inflicted by dictators and the spiritual anesthesia of their victims. “There’s just a lot of super-talented, hard-working people in China that strongly believe in manufacturing,” Musk said in an interview with the Financial Times on Tuesday. “And they won’t just be burning the midnight oil, they’ll be
“There’s going to be a new world order out there, and we’ve got to lead it,” US President Joe Biden said after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine upended global geopolitics. Far from Earth, that transition is already happening. Just like in the era of Sputnik and Apollo more than half a century ago, world leaders are again racing to achieve dominance in outer space — but there is one big difference: Whereas the US and the Soviet Union hashed out a common set of rules at the UN, this time around the world’s top superpowers cannot even agree on basic principles to govern
With a Taiwan contingency increasingly more plausible, Taiwanese lobbies in Japan are calling for the government to pass a version of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), emulating the US precedent. Such a measure would surely enable Tokyo to make formal and regular contact with Taipei for dialogue, consultation, policy coordination and planning in military security. This would fill the missing link of the trilateral US-Japan-Taiwan security ties, rendering a US military defense of Taiwan more feasible through the support of the US-Japan alliance. Yet, particular caution should be exercised, as Beijing would probably view the move as a serious challenge to
As the Soviet Union was collapsing in the late 1980s and Russia seemed to be starting the process of democratization, 36-year-old US academic Francis Fukuyama had the audacity to assert that the world was at the “end of history.” Fukuyama claimed that democratic systems would become the norm, and peace would prevail the world over. He published a grandiose essay, “The End of History?” in the summer 1989 edition of the journal National Interest. Overnight, Fukuyama became a famous theorist in the US, western Europe, Japan and even Taiwan. Did the collapse of the Soviet Union mark the end of an era as
RSS