Former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo on March 4 called for the US government to “offer the Republic of China (Taiwan) America’s diplomatic recognition as a free and sovereign country,” and called Taiwan’s independence an “already existent reality.”
Pompeo’s remarks — made in speech on a visit to Taiwan, which he later posted on Twitter and Facebook — were as far as I know the first such remarks made by a former senior US diplomatic or national security official since Washington broke diplomatic relations with Taipei in 1979.
Pompeo said he expressed his personal opinion, which should not be interpreted as representing the policy mindset of the administration of US President Joe Biden.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly and appropriately expressed his respect for Pompeo’s remarks, but did not further comment on them.
However, Pompeo’s sincerity can be seen from his public call for a belated, but well-deserved diplomatic recognition for Taiwan’s 23 million free, democratic and peace-loving citizens.
When I was stationed in Washington, I was several times invited to represent Taiwan at international ministerial meetings chaired by Pompeo at the US Department of State, as well as state dinners.
At these events, we discussed topics such as the fight against the Islamic State terror group, in which Taiwan took part by donating funds for mine clearance, a mobile hospital and humanitarian aid for refugees.
Other topics included international religious freedom, and we took part in conferences of the community of democracies.
To be on the safe side, the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US always checked in advance with the state department as to what title should be used on my name tag, place cards and attendance lists. When it comes to diplomacy, any detail can lead to unexpected problems, so such details cannot be taken lightly.
The state department is just as cautious and meticulous in its handling of sensitive interactions between Taiwan and the US. I understand that the organizers have on more than one occasion been instructed to “call a spade a spade.”
Consequently, the title used was always plain and simple “Taiwan” — not just on my nametag, but also in group photographs with Pompeo, and when Pompeo was chairing meetings and called on me to speak, as well as the title of the country whose representative was speaking, as displayed on a large screen at the venue.
This clearly demonstrated senior state department officials’ opinion that “Taiwan is Taiwan,” and that there is no need to blur or hide the fact.
Pompeo has taken a consistently friendly attitude to Taiwan.
During his tenure, the US government declassified the “six assurances” made to Taiwan in 1982 by then-US president Ronald Reagan.
Pompeo publicly congratulated President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on her re-election and instructed senior officials to welcome then-vice president-elect William Lai (賴清德) when he visited Washington.
Shortly before leaving office, Pompeo announced the removal of “internal rules” that have restricted Taiwan-US relations for more than 40 years. This was especially appreciated by Taiwanese personnel stationed in the US.
Given this record, the support that Pompeo voiced for Taiwan during his visit was to be expected. By deepening the two countries’ mutual trust and joint efforts, Taiwan-US relations can reasonably be expected to move forward from “normalization” to “formalization,” including, at an appropriate time, renaming our representative offices in the US.
Stanley Kao was representative to the US from 2016 to 2020.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath