Having spent a diplomatic career working on Russia/USSR and Taiwan/China, I have followed events in those regions closely for more than fifty years. Early on, I expended countless brain cells obtaining spoken and written proficiency in Russian and Chinese. Therefore, I feel I must speak out now on Vladimir Putin’s reckless invasion of Ukraine and what it means for Asia.
There is cause for grave concern, but also reason not to go overboard on the comparison between what is currently unfolding in Ukraine and Taiwan’s situation. Putin’s reckless adventurism caught the world by surprise, but we might have seen this coming. Vladimir Putin belongs to a class of Russians who have long bemoaned the collapse of the Soviet Union, with its domination of a vast territory from the plains of Europe to the Pacific Ocean. Many of them like to blame Gorbachev and Yeltsin for this supposed tragedy, though the seeds of the dissolution of the USSR run deep. The strong nationalist, cultural and geopolitical roots of the collapse of the USSR were there over thirty years ago.
Most of the world embraced the transformation of the Soviet Union into fifteen independent and separate young nations, thankful that all this occurred largely without violence or upheaval. But some, including a restless young KGB agent named Vladimir Putin, brooded over the seeming loss of Soviet greatness. The result was the shocking — at least to much of the world — invasion of Ukraine by Russian military forces a few days ago. As I write this, the battle rages on, with the Ukrainians putting up surprisingly effective resistance to the superior military might of Moscow.
Meanwhile, the world has reacted with admirable unity in opposing Putin’s power grab. The basket of political and economic sanctions being rolled out against Russia is having immediate and serious consequences for the Russian Federation’s already fragile standing. The impact will only increase over time. In short, Putin has badly miscalculated, and in my opinion will ultimately fail in his revanchist ambitions. Whether this will result in his removal from power is up to the Russian people, but I believe it is a real possibility.
A word about Beijing’s reaction. Some accounts suggest Putin shared his plans with President Xi (習近平) when they met on the margins of the Winter Olympics in China. If Putin didn’t alert Xi to his plans, Mr. Xi has the right to be offended by his authoritarian partner for being surprised, just as Beijing completed its hosting of the winter Olympics. This is not how strategic partners are supposed to behave. But Putin has long shown a disdain for traditional values, and so I would not be that surprised if he failed to warn Xi of his plans in advance. If Putin did give Xi advance warning, I would hope the Chinese strongman cautioned his northern neighbor of the inherent risks. We may never know all the details.
To the question now: Does Putin’s invasion of Ukraine increase the danger of an early attempt by Beijing to launch an invasion against Taiwan? I tend to doubt it, though not with thorough confidence. Xi is approaching a key moment in his political ambitions, as he hopes to extend his rule into a third five-year term at this fall’s Party Congress. That would break with a decades-long practice of limited terms, and in essence make Xi — like Putin — leader for life. In connection with this ambition, there is no urgent necessity for Xi to roll the dice and gamble all his marbles on an attempt to use military force to compel Taiwan’s subjugation.
Let me start with the challenges. First, a military assault on Taiwan from mainland China poses considerably greater challenges than what Putin has faced thus far in his attack on Ukraine. There is the far from trivial matter of crossing nearly one hundred miles of open water, successfully establishing a beachhead on Taiwan, and then consolidating that by moving its forces inland and subduing Taiwan military resistance. Second, unlike in Ukraine, any Chinese attempt to attack Taiwan faces the real possibility of American military involvement, in addition to the probability that other US allies, including Australia and Japan, may also join in the fight. Third, I would contend that Taiwan’s military is much more prepared to counter any such attack than Ukraine was. By stating this, I am focusing not only on the readiness of the Taiwan military, but also its network of friends in the region.
It grieves me to discuss this, because I firmly believe any military adventure by Beijing against Taiwan would be a tragedy for all concerned, and could plunge East Asia into troubled waters for a long time to come. Taiwan, by dint of its remarkable and vibrant economy, is a key player in both regional and global economics. The island’s dominance of the high tech market, highlighted by companies like Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) TSMC and Stan Shih’s (施振榮) ACER’s global standing, is a case in point. Any disruption of chip manufacturing would quickly ripple throughout the world, dependent as we all are on the state-of-art microchips and computers that power so much of our world; including this laptop on which I am writing here.
I also think Mr. Xi could seriously jeopardize his ability to extend his reign as China’s kingpin if he gambled on a Taiwan adventure. He is already on thin ice, as he seeks to lengthen his rule indefinitely at the fall Party Congress. Those who facilitated Xi’s rise to power must have serious misgivings about his ambitions. After all, it is they who elevated him to power back in 2012. I have little doubt that several of them harbor ambitions for the top job themselves. Xi’s gamble therefore runs the real risk of failure, which could lead to his being deposed in a palace coup.
In sum, as a longtime student of both Russian and Chinese politics, I think the near-term chances that Beijing’s risk-averse leaders would gamble on launching an unprovoked attack on Taiwan are not high. Meanwhile, all eyes remain on Ukraine, and its valiant effort to thwart Russian conquest. The stakes for security in Europe couldn’t be higher. My thoughts are with the people of Ukraine, and I hope this unwarranted and unwanted crisis can quickly be resolved without further bloodshed and suffering. If this leads to Putin’s fall, all the better.
Ambassador Stephen M. Young (ret.) lived in Kaohsiung as a boy over 50 years ago, and served in AIT four times: as a young consular officer (1981-’82), as a language student (1989-’90), as Deputy Director (1998-2001) and as Director (2006-’9). He visits often and writes regularly about Taiwan matters. Young was also US Ambassador to Kyrgyzstan and Consul General to Hong Kong during his 33-year career as a foreign service officer. He has a BA from Wesleyan University and a PhD from the University of Chicago.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS