Real-estate prices have continued to go through the roof, as the property market remains bullish. Statistics released by the Ministry of the Interior showed that 3.15 million properties exchanged hands last year, rising by 21,605, or 6.62 percent, from the previous year, prompting the ministry to introduce amendments to crack down on speculation.
Investing in the housing market has become just a dream, because selling property can be heartrending, and anyone currently sitting on a property, using it as their home and waiting for a time when prices would rise to sell it would be waiting for a long time, Cushman & Wakefield Taiwan general manager Billy Yen (顏炳立) has said.
I could not agree more with this assessment: The following two metrics suggest that we are sitting in a housing bubble that could burst at any time.
First, for the past two years, mortgages accounted for more than 40 percent of GDP — a ratio internationally recognized as a warning sign of a housing bubble.
Data from the central bank and the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) showed that in December 2020, home mortgages totaled more than NT$8 trillion (US$286.8 billion at the current exchange rate), which was 40.64 percent of that year’s GDP of about NT$19.8 trillion.
Adding in construction loans of just under NT$2.5 trillion would raise the total amount of loans to about NT$10.5 trillion, accounting for 53.07 percent of GDP.
Despite the central bank’s implementation of selective credit-control measures, home mortgages climbed to more than NT$8.8 trillion in December last year, accounting for 40.66 percent of that year’s GDP of NT$21.65 trillion.
Again, adding in construction loans of more than NT$2.8 trillion, total loans would be NT$11.6 trillion, or 53.63 percent of GDP.
Central bank Governor Yang Chin-long’s (楊金龍) concern over surging property loans is understandable, including why he decided to expand selective credit controls.
The second factor is housing supply continues to rise, while the population is falling. A DGBAS population and housing survey for 2020 showed a record number of vacant homes of 1.66 million.
Ministry figures showed that 104,872 residential building permits and 170,465 construction permits were issued last year for a total of 275,337. If this is multiplied by the average of 2.88 people per family, as per the ministry’s calculations, the new housings could accommodate more than 792,000 people. This figure does not even include the 98,260 housing permits issued in 2020.
When the population is falling and there is a housing surplus, what is left is a housing bubble.
The housing market has had its ups and downs: In the late 1980s, when the stock market was booming, housing prices soared. However, when the housing market collapsed in the late 1990s, homeowners were left unable to pay their mortgages, leading to a massive number of properties being placed under the hammer for horribly low bids.
My house in Nantou County is next to a congregate housing complex built in the 1990s, when it sold for NT$100,000 per ping (3.3m2); in the early 2000s, a considerable number of these properties were put up for auction, fetching only NT$30,000 per ping.
This should come as a warning for anyone thinking of purchasing a house in the current climate.
Wang Juei-hsing is a former head of the Taiwan Provincial Government’s Land Development Division.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
Taiwan is to hold a referendum on Saturday next week to decide whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, which was shut down in May after 40 years of service, should restart operations for as long as another 20 years. The referendum was proposed by the opposition Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and passed in the legislature with support from the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Its question reads: “Do you agree that the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should continue operations upon approval by the competent authority and confirmation that there are no safety concerns?” Supporters of the proposal argue that nuclear power
RSS